Investigating changes in agricultural land use in Ahvaz county between 2000 and 2020 using using landsat satellite images

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran, Email

10.22059/ijbse.2025.389807.665586

Abstract

Land use change is a major challenge in natural resource management and can have significant environmental, economic, social, and cultural consequences. The aim of this Study is to investigate land use changes in Ahvaz County from 2000 to 2020 using remote sensing, in order to provide an overview of land use changes for land management and urban planning. Images were acquired from Landsat satellites, and land classification into four land use types, including agricultural lands, built-up areas, barren lands, and water bodies, was performed for the years 2000, 2007, 2014, and 2020 using spectral indices and the maximum likelihood classification algorithm. The Kappa coefficient for the years 2000, 2007, 2014, and 2020 were 87.23%, 88.59%, 91.26%, and 93.23%, respectively, and the overall accuracy index was 89.56%, 91.35%, 93.58%, and 94.89%, respectively. The results showed that, during the study period, the area of land agriculture and built-up land use increased by 2.77 and 2.96 times, respectively. The increase in agricultural land was mainly due to the conversion of barren lands to agriculture. The increase in built-up areas has led to a decrease in the fertile agricultural lands around cities. The drastic changes in land use in the last two decades indicate the need for careful, scientific, and participatory planning by all agencies involved in land use change and those in charge of affairs, in order to reduce the negative environmental, social, and economic consequences and to preserve the natural resources of the region.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Land represents a fundamental, finite, and irreplaceable natural resource that must be conserved and sustained for future generations. This critical resource is susceptible to pressures arising from both anthropogenic factors, such as population growth, and natural processes, including drought and erosion. Land use and land cover change (LULCC) are recognized as key drivers influencing global environmental change, impacting a wide array of environmental and natural resource attributes, including water quality, air and land resources, and ecosystem functions (Canaz et al., 2017). Timely and accurate detection of LULCC is therefore essential for enabling effective natural resource management and promoting sustainable land use practices. In recent decades, the increasing demand for food, energy, and living space driven by a growing global population has placed considerable strain on Earth’s limited resources. The escalating exploitation of natural resources to meet the needs of an expanding population represents a major challenge facing humanity today (Jiang et al., 2020). This intensifies pressure on ecosystems, leading to climate change, alterations in biogeochemical cycles (e.g., water and nutrient cycles), biodiversity loss, and significant LULCC (Yi-ming et al., 2022). Ahvaz County, one of Iran’s most important industrial and agricultural regions, and a major oil production hub, has faced numerous environmental, social, and economic challenges in recent years. A major contributing factor to this situation is the change in LULCC.

Method

This study investigated land use and land cover (LULC) within Ahvaz County, classifying the area into four primary categories: built-up areas, barren lands, agricultural lands, and water bodies. Landsat satellite imagery was employed as the primary data source, utilizing Landsat 7 ETM+ and Landsat 8 OLI imagery acquired for four distinct time points: 2000, 2007, 2014, and 2020. The satellite images underwent rigorous preprocessing steps, including radiometric and atmospheric correction, to minimize distortions and enhance data quality. Subsequently, LULC classification was performed using the Maximum Likelihood Classification (MLC) algorithm. MLC was selected due to its demonstrated effectiveness and high accuracy in land cover mapping applications. Analysis of historical weather patterns indicated that March typically exhibits stable and favorable weather conditions in Khuzestan province. Therefore, satellite imagery acquired during March was preferentially used to facilitate consistent monitoring of LULC throughout the study period. The initial image preprocessing involved converting digital numbers to spectral radiance and correcting the images using the Fast Line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercubes (FLAASH) atmospheric correction model. FLAASH is particularly effective for correcting visible, near-infrared, and shortwave infrared wavelengths. Following atmospheric correction, images were mosaicked and cropped to the extent of the study area using ENVI 5.6 software. The classification accuracy was assessed using the Kappa coefficient and Overall Accuracy index, with values ranging from 87.23% to 93.23% for Kappa and 89.56% to 94.89% for Overall Accuracy, confirming the reliability of the classification results. These two metrics provide valuable information in evaluating classification models. Considering both metrics allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the models’ accuracy and predictive power, leading to more accurate and reliable results.

Results

The classified LULC maps for the years 2000, 2007, 2014, and 2020 are presented in Figures 2 to 4. Analysis of these maps reveals notable changes in LULC patterns over the study period. In 2000, agricultural land cover was less extensive and more fragmented compared to subsequent years. Between 2000 and 2020, agricultural land increased by approximately 277%, built-up areas expanded by 297%, and water bodies slightly increased by 6%. In contrast, barren land decreased by 33%. The sharp increase in urban areas led to the loss of high-quality agricultural lands around cities. Specifically, the area of agricultural land in Ahvaz County increased from approximately 115 thousand hectares in 2000 to 319, 362, and 319 hectares in 2007, 2014, and 2020, respectively. This increase was primarily attributed to the conversion of barren land into agricultural land. However, in 2020, the trend of agricultural land expansion stopped and the area under cultivation of agricultural land decreased compared to 2014. This decline can be attributed to factors such as severe droughts, reduced availability of irrigation water resources, and continued expansion of urban areas. A more in-depth analysis of the factors influencing agricultural development during this period, including droughts, water policies and urban planning, is crucial for a better understanding of this phenomenon and future projections. Throughout the study period, built-up areas increased from 1.24% of Ahvaz county in 2000 to 3.27% in 2020. The majority of new construction occurred in the vicinity of urban area, often encroaching upon barren and agricultural land. These findings are consistent with other studies. For example, Ahmed et al. (2014) reported a 41.27% expansion of Lahore’s urban area between 2000 and 2020 accompanied by a 13.42% decrease in vegetation cover, 31.2% decrease in barren land, and 51.6% decrease in water water bodies. Similarly, Salem et al. (2020) found that approximately 9,600 hectares of agricultural land around Cairo, Egypt, were converted to urban use between 2010 and 2018, representing an average annual loss of 1,200 hectares.

Conclusions

Remote sensing technologies provide a cost-effective and accurate means for monitoring LULCC over extensive areas. These tools have become indispensable for natural resource management and environmental monitoring applications. The results of this study, covering the period from 2000 to 2020, indicate substantial LULCC in Ahvaz County. Specifically, compared to 2000, agricultural and built-up areas land increased by approximately 277 and 297 percent, respectively, while barren land decreased by 33 percent. These changes have resulted in alterations to land cover composition, landscape structure, and potentially ecosystem functions. The expansion of agricultural land has led to increased demand on natural resources, particularly water, placing strain on available water supplies. This limitation has likely contributed to the observed decrease in agricultural land area in 2020 compared to 2014. Concurrently, the expansion of built-up areas has resulted in the loss of valuable agricultural land, particularly in areas surrounding urban centers. The findings highlight the need for sustainable land use planning and water resource management to mitigate the negative impacts of rapid urbanization and agricultural expansion. Improved water resource management, including the implementation of efficient irrigation techniques, sustainable agricultural practices (utilizing precision agriculture techniques, soil and salinity management, etc.), and controlled urban development through regulations restricting urban expansion into agricultural lands, are key solutions to prevent the decline of agricultural land, mitigate agricultural environmental impacts, and ensure food security. This study provides valuable insights for policymakers to implement regulations that balance urban development with agricultural sustainability. Based on the findings of this research, it is suggested that future studies utilize machine learning models to predict future land use changes. Furthermore, assessing the impact of land use change on the regional microclimate, soil quality and erosion, quantity and quality of surface and groundwater resources, biodiversity, and the consequences for rural-urban migration patterns and demographic shifts is deemed essential.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.A., A.A and S.H.; methodology, K.A. and A.A; software, K.A. and S.H; validation, K.A., A.A and S.H.; formal analysis, K.A and A.A.; investigation, K.A.; resources, K.A. and A.A; data curation, A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, K.A; writing—review and editing, A.A and S.H; visualization, K.A.; supervision, A.A.; project administration, A.A.; funding acquisition, A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization of the article and writing of the original and subsequent drafts.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on request

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran, for providing financial support through the research grant (No. SCU.AA98.29747).

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

 

 

Abiyat, M., Abiayat, M., & Abiyat, M. (2021). Modeling the Process of Spatio-Temporal Changes in LandUse and Urban Development of Ahvaz Based on Spatial Planning Approach. Town and Country Planning, 13 (1), 215-245. Doi: 10.22059/jtcp.2020.313706.670174. (in Persian).
Ahmad, MN., Shao, Z., & Javed, A. (2023). Modelling land use/land cover (LULC) change dynamics, future prospects, and its environmental impacts based on geospatial data models and remote sensing data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 32985-33001. DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-24442-2.
Ahmadpour, A., Solaimani, K.,  Shokri, M., & Ghorbani, J. (2014). Comparison of three common methods in supervised classification of satellite data for vegetation studies. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 5(3), 77-89. (in Persian).
Andreu, A., Dube, T., Nieto, H., Mudau, A.E., González-Dugo, M.P., Guzinski, R., & Hülsmann, S., (2019). Remote sensing of water use and water stress in the African savanna ecosystem at local scale–Development and validation of a monitoring tool. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 112, 154-164.
Arowolo, AO., & Deng, X. (2018). Land use/land cover change and statistical modelling of cultivated land change drivers in Nigeria. Regional environmental change, 18, 247-259.
Arunyawat, S., & Shrestha, RP. (2016). Assessing land use change and its impact on ecosystem services in Northern Thailand. Sustainability, 8(8), 768.
Campbell, JB. (2002). Introduction to remote sensing. Guilford Press.
Canaz, S., Aliefendioglu, Y., & Tanrıvermis, H. (2017). Change detection using Landsat images and an analysis of the linkages between the change and property tax values in the Istanbul Province of Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 200, 446-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.008.
Chen, D., Lu, X., Hu, W., Zhang, Ch., & Lin, Y. (2021). How urban sprawl influences eco environmental quality: Empirical research in China by using the Spatial Durbin model. Ecological Indicators, 131, 108-113.
Chen, L., Huang, H., Han, D., Wang, X., Xiao, Y., Yang, H. & Du, J. (2023). Investigation on the spatial and temporal patterns of coupling sustainable development posture and economic development in World Natural Heritage Sites: A case study of Jiuzhaigou, China. Ecological Indicators, 146, 109920.
Da silva cruz, J., Cavalcante Blanco, C., & de Oliveira Júnior, J. (2022). Modeling of land use and land cover change dynamics for future projection of the Amazon number curve. Science of the Total Environment,  811, 152348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152348.
Dorodian, H., & Drodian, A. (2017). Social and Ecological Impacts of Agricultural Land Use Change. Journal of Land Management, 5(2), 81-97. Doi: 10.22092/lmj.2018.115849. (in Persian).
Fahong, W., Xuqing, W., & Sayre, K. (2004). Comparison of conventional, flood irrigated, flat planting with furrow irrigated, raised bed planting for winter wheat in China. Field Crops Res, 87, 35–42.
FAO. (2015). The state of food and agriculture: Social protection and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Farhadi, N., Kiyani, A., & Ebadi, H. (2019). Target detection from high-resolution remote sensing images using deep learning methods. Iranian Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 11(1), 48-64. Doi: 10.52547/gisj.11.1.48. (in Persian).
Foroutan, S., Shariat, M., Kheirkhah zarkesh, M., Sarvar, R. (2020). Investigation of the trend of land use changes in Rey city using remote sensing data. Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 7(5), 55-66. (in Persian).
Goodarzi Mehr, S. (2010). Comparison of BEC, SAM, SVM, MLC and neural network classification methods for field separation using ETM+ sensor images. The Second National Conference on Agriculture and Sustainable Development (Opportunities and Challenges Ahead). 11 pages. (in Persian).
Ilori, CO., Pahlevan, N., & Knudby, A. (2019). Analyzing performances of different atmospheric correction techniques for Landsat 8: Application for coastal remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 11(4), 469.
IPCC. (2019). Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.
Islam, GT., Islam, AS., Shopan, AA., Rahman, MM., Lázár, AN., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2015). Implications of agricultural land use change to ecosystem services in the Ganges delta. Journal of environmental management, 161, 443-452.
Javed, A., Cheng, Q., Peng, H., Altan, O., Li, Y., Ara, I., Huq, E., Ali, Y., & Saleem, N. (2021). Review of spectral indices for urban remote sensing. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 87(7), 513-524.
Jiang, H., Hu, H., Zhong, R., Xu, J., Xu, J., Huang, J., & Lin, T. (2020). A deep learning approach to conflating heterogeneous geospatial data for corn yield estimation: a case study of the US Corn Belt at the county level. Global Change  Biology, 26 (3), 1754–1766. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14885.
Jiang, H., Hu, H., Zhong, R., Xu, J., Xu, J., Huang, J., & Lin, T. (2020). A deep learning approach to conflating heterogeneous geospatial data for corn yield estimation: a case study of the US Corn Belt at the county level. Glob. Chang. Biol, 26 (3), 1754–1766.
Ju, J., & Masek, J.G. (2016). The vegetation greenness trend in Canada and US Alaska from 1984–2012 Landsat data. Remote Sensing Environment, 176, 1–16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.01.001.
Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., Coomes, O. T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., George, P. S., Homewood, K., Imbernon , J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E. F. Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P. S., Richards, J. F., Skanes, H., Staffen, W., Stone, G. D., Svdin, U., Veldkamp, T., Vogel, C., & Xu, W. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11, 261-269. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3.
Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J. (2015). Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.
Liu, Z., Wu, Y., Zhang, X., Li, M., Liu, C., Li, W., ., Fu, M., Qin, S., Fan, Q., Luo, H., & Lu, C. (2023). Comparison of variable extraction methods using surface field data and its key influencing factors: A case study on aboveground biomass of Pinus densata forest using the original bands and vegetation indices of Landsat 8. Ecological Indicators, 157, 111307.
Mishra, M., Bhattacharyya, D., Mondal, B., Paul, S., da Silva, RM., Santos, CAG., & Guria, R., 2025. Forecasting shoreline dynamics and land use/land cover changes in Balukhand-Konark Wildlife Sanctuary (India) using geospatial techniques and machine learning. Science of The Total Environment, 975, 179207.
Mombeini, M., Asiae, M., & Karamshahi, A. (2013). Comparison of maximum likelihood and fuzzy methods in the preparation of the land use/cover map of southern Khuzestan using Landsat images. Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System in Natural Resources, 4 (2), 69-79. https://www.sid.ir/paper/189619/en. (in Persian).
Murugan, M., Selvaraj, R., & Nagarajan, S. (2022). Assessment of land use land cover change detection in multitemporal satellite images using machine learning algorithms. In Cognitive Systems and Signal Processing in Image Processing (pp. 27-45). Academic Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824410-4.00006-4.
Nourozi, A. (2019). Monitoring and prediction of land use changes by remote sensing technique (case study: Dust sources of south-east ahwaz). Msc Thesis, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan. Molasani, (in Persian).
Pôças, I., Calera, A., Campos, I., & Cunha, M. (2020). Remote sensing for estimating and mapping single and basal crop coefficientes: A review on spectral vegetation indices approaches. Agricultural Water Management, 233, 106081.
Ramankutty, N., Evan, AT., Monfreda, C., & Foley, J.A. (2008). Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global biogeochemical cycles22(1).
Riyahi, V., Ziyaean, F., Azizpor, F., & Daroeii, P. (2018). Determining and checking the cultivated area of ​​crops in Lanjanat area using satellite images. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 19 (52), 147-169. Doi: 10.29252/jgs.19.52.147. (in Persian).
Saha, P. & Gayen, S.K. (2025). A geospatial assessment of land use changes and their influence on land surface temperature in Koch Bihar district, West Bengal. Results in Earth Sciences, 100089.
Salem, M., Tsurusaki, N., & Divigalpitiya, P. (2020). Remote sensing-based detection of agricultural land losses around Greater Cairo since the Egyptian revolution of 2011. Land Use Policy, 97,104744.
Sreenivas, K., Sekhar, N. S., Saxena, M., Paliwal, R., Pathak, S., Porwal, M. C., Fyzee, M. A., Rao, S. V. C. K., Wadodkar, M., Anasuya, T., Murthy, M. S. R., Ravisankar, T., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2015). Estimating inter-annual diversity of seasonal agricultural area using multi-temporal resourcesat data. Journal of Environmental Management, 161, 433-442. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.031.
Talukdar, S., Singha, P., Mahato, S., Pal, S., Liou, Y.A. & Rahman, A. (2020). Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations—A review. Remote sensing, 12(7), 1135.
Tran, T.V., Reef, R., & Zhu, X. (2022). A review of spectral indices for mangrove remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 14(19), 4868.
Wang, J., Bretz, M., Dewan, MAA., & Delavar, MA. (2022). Machine learning in modelling land-use and land cover-change (LULCC): Current status, challenges and prospects. Science of the Total Environment822, 153559.
Wulder, MA., Masek, JG., Cohen, WB., Loveland, TR., & Woodcock, CE. (2012). Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat. Remote Sensing of Environment, 122, 2-10
Xue, J., & Su, B. (2017). Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: A review of developments and applications. Journal of sensors, 1, 1353691.
Yi-Ming, L., Lei, Zh., Mei, Zh., Jian, L., Yan, W., Li, S., & Quing-Li, L. (2022). A neural networks based method for suspended sediment concentration retrieval from GF-5 hyperspectral images. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 41, 10.11972. Doi: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2022.01.029.
Zhang, X., Liu, L., Chen, X., Gao, Y., Xie, S., & Mi, J. (2021). Glc fcs30: global land-cover product with fine classification system at 30 m using time-series landsat imagery. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13 (6), 2753–2776.
Ziaul Hoque, M., Cui, Sh., Islam, I., Xu, L., & Tang, J. (2020). Future Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services in the Lower Meghna River Estuary, Bangladesh. Sustainability. 1-18.