Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering

Iranian Journal of Biosystem Engineering

Optimizing a MicroRNA Biosensor for the Detection of Spot Blotch Disease in Barley Plants

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
2 Department of Plant Protection,, Faculty of Plant Production, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
3 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Water and Soil Engineering, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract
Although microRNAs are considered key regulators of plant responses to biotic stresses, their accurate measurement is challenging due to their extremely low concentrations. The aim of this study was to develop and optimize a microRNA-based electrochemical biosensor and to evaluate its performance in detecting biotic stress caused by spot blotch disease in barley plants. An electrochemical biosensor was designed based on the hybridization of the target microRNA with an oligonucleotide probe immobilized on a gold electrode surface, followed by the adsorption of positively charged silver–polyethyleneimine nanoparticles. Support vector machine regression was employed to optimize the probe volume and nanoparticle mass. The experimental dataset consisted of 100 observations, and five-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate model performance. After confirming the satisfactory performance of the model in predicting the electrochemical response of the biosensor (mean squared error of 0.004 and coefficient of determination of 0.97), the optimal probe volume and nanoparticle mass were determined by the developed model to be 9.15 mL and 1.85 µg, respectively. The calibration curve of the optimized biosensor exhibited a linear range from 10⁻19 to 10⁻11 M, and the biosensor was used to measure the concentrations of miRNA168 and miRNA397, which play essential roles in plant responses to spot blotch fungal disease. The biosensor data indicated a significant difference in the concentrations of these microRNAs between healthy and infected plants, confirming its effectiveness for early disease detection. Overall, the results demonstrate the considerable potential of the proposed biosensor for accurate identification of biotic stresses in plants.
Keywords

Introduction

microRNAs are a class of small non-coding RNA molecules that play a central role in post-transcriptional gene regulation and are critically involved in plant growth, development, and responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Under biotic stress conditions such as pathogen infection, miRNAs rapidly respond by fine-tuning the expression of defense-related genes, making them promising molecular indicators for early stress detection in plants. However, the extremely low endogenous concentration of plant miRNAs, often in the femtomolar or attomolar range, poses major challenges for their reliable quantification using conventional techniques such as qPCR, microarrays, or northern blotting. In recent years, electrochemical biosensors have emerged as powerful analytical tools for sensitive miRNA detection due to their simplicity, high sensitivity, and potential for miniaturization. Nevertheless, the performance of such biosensors strongly depends on the optimal configuration of key design parameters, including probe density and nanomaterial loading. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and optimize an electrochemical miRNA biosensor using a machine learning–based approach and to evaluate its applicability for detecting brown spot disease–induced biotic stress in barley plants through quantification of miRNA168 and miRNA397.

Material and methods

An electrochemical microRNA biosensor was constructed based on the hybridization of target microRNAs with thiolated complementary oligonucleotide probes immobilized on a gold working electrode. Following hybridization, positively charged polyethyleneimine–silver nanoparticles (PEI–Ag NPs) were electrostatically attracted to the negatively charged probe–microRNA duplex, generating an electrochemical signal proportional to the target microRNA concentration. Cyclic voltammetry measurements were performed using a three-electrode system. To optimize biosensor performance, two key parameters—the probe volume (5–10 µL) and the mass of PEI–Ag NPs (1–6 µg)—were varied, resulting in a dataset of 100 experimental observations obtained at a target microRNA concentration of 1 fM. A support vector regression model with a radial basis function kernel was developed to model the nonlinear relationship between input variables and the biosensor response. Model hyperparameters were optimized using a genetic algorithm, and five-fold cross-validation was applied to assess predictive performance and prevent overfitting. After model validation, a dense input grid was generated to identify the global optimum configuration. The optimized biosensor was then calibrated using various dilutions of standard microRNA. Barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L., susceptible cultivar ‘Sahra’) were grown under controlled greenhouse conditions and inoculated with the spot blotch pathogen Bipolaris sorokiniana. Fourteen days after inoculation, total RNA was extracted from leaf tissues, and microRNA concentrations were measured using the optimized biosensor.

Results and discussion

The support vector regression model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, with a mean squared error of 0.004 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.97 across cross-validation folds, indicating strong generalization capability. The optimal biosensor configuration was identified at a probe volume of 9.15 mL and a PEI–Ag NP mass of 1.85 µg, neither of which lay at the boundaries of the tested ranges, confirming the adequacy of the experimental design space. The optimized biosensor exhibited a wide linear detection range from 10¹ to 10¹¹ M, along with good repeatability. Application of the biosensor to plant samples revealed significant alterations in miRNA168 and miRNA397 concentrations in infected barley leaves compared with healthy controls. The observed increase in miRNA168 is consistent with its regulatory role in targeting AGO1, suggesting a feedback mechanism to balance RNA silencing activity during immune activation. Similarly, elevated miRNA397 levels imply modulation of laccase-mediated lignification pathways, potentially favoring the accumulation of antimicrobial phenolic compounds during early infection stages. These findings demonstrate that the developed biosensor is capable of capturing biologically meaningful microRNA expression changes associated with pathogen-induced stress.

Conclusion

This study presents a machine learning–assisted strategy for optimizing an electrochemical microRNA biosensor and demonstrates its successful application for detecting biotic stress in barley plants. The integration of support vector regression with experimental biosensor data enabled accurate modeling and efficient identification of optimal design parameters, resulting in high sensitivity and a broad linear detection range. The optimized biosensor effectively discriminated between healthy and diseased plants based on miRNA expression profiles, highlighting its potential as a rapid and sensitive tool for early plant stress diagnostics. Although environmental variability and the multifactorial regulation of miRNA expression remain challenges for large-scale field deployment, the proposed approach provides a strong foundation for developing advanced biosensing platforms for precision agriculture and plant health monitoring.

Funding

The study was funded by the Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources under the title of Approved Grants for PhD Dissertations.

Authorship contribution

K.R. and K.A.: Conceptualization; N.D.: Methodology; N.D. and K.A.: Formal analysis; N.D.: Writing—original draft preparation; K.R. and K.A.: Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data availability statement

Data is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources for funding.

Ethical considerations

The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism, and any form of misconduct.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Aina, O., Bakare, O. O., Fadaka, A. O., Keyster, M., & Klein, A. (2024). Plant biomarkers as early detection tools in stress management in food crops: a review. Planta, 259(3), 60.
Asefpour Vakilian, K. (2020a). Determination of nitrogen deficiency-related microRNAs in plants using fluorescence quenching of graphene oxide nanosheets. Molecular and cellular probes, 52, 101576.
Asefpour Vakilian, K. (2020b). Machine learning improves our knowledge about miRNA functions towards plant abiotic stresses. Scientific Reports, 10, 3041.
Asefpour Vakilian, K. (2025). A smart multiplexed microRNA biosensor based on FRET for the prediction of mechanical damage and storage period of strawberry fruits. Plant Molecular Biology, 115(2), 37.
Balabin, R. M., & Lomakina, E. I. (2011). Support vector machine regression (SVR/LS-SVM)—an alternative to neural networks (ANN) for analytical chemistry? Comparison of nonlinear methods on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data. Analyst, 136(8), 1703-1712.
Basak, P., Gurjar, M. S., Kashyap, N., Kumar, T. P. J., Khokhar, M. K., Jha, S., & Saharan, M. S. (2024). Morphological, pathogenic and molecular analysis of Bipolaris sorokiniana inciting spot blotch of barley in India. Indian Phytopathology, 77(1), 93-102.
Chen, L., Fang, Y., Zhou, X., Zhang, M., Yao, R., & Tian, B. (2023). Magnetic DNA nanomachine for on-particle cascade amplification-based ferromagnetic resonance detection of plant MicroRNA. Analytical Chemistry, 95(12), 5411–5418.
Chen, H., Zhou, S., Chen, J., Zhou, J., Fan, K., Pan, Y., & Ping, J. (2024). An integrated plant glucose monitoring system based on microneedle-enabled electrochemical sensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 248, 115964.
Crawford, B. M., Strobbia, P., Wang, H. N., Zentella, R., Boyanov, M. I., Pei, Z. M., Sun, T. P., Kemner, K. M., & Vo-Dinh, T. (2019). Plasmonic nanoprobes for in vivo multimodal sensing and bioimaging of microRNA within plants. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 11(8), 7743-7754.
Derakhshan, N., Rahnama, K., & Asefpour Vakilian, K. (2026). Plant growth promoting and biocontrol potential of endophytic strains of Cladosporium spp., under pathogen stress of Bipolaris sorokiniana in barley. Biological Control, 218, 106059.
Ding, Y., Chen, Z., & Zhu, C. (2011). Microarray-based analysis of cadmium-responsive microRNAs in rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of experimental botany, 62(10), 3563–3573.
Ding, T., Li, W., Li, F., Ren, M., & Wang, W. (2024). microRNAs: Key regulators in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses via endogenous and cross-kingdom mechanisms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(2), 1154.
Dokhanchi, H., Babai-Ahari, A., Arzanlou, M., & Abed-Ashtiani, F. (2022). Characterization of Pyrenophora, Bipolaris, Curvularia and Exserohilum species associated with leaf spot diseases on barley in East Azerbaijan province, using morphological and molecular data. Journal of Applied Research in Plant Protection, 11(1), 1-18.
Dorosti, N., Khatami, S. H., Karami, N., Taheri-Anganeh, M., Mahhengam, N., Rajabvand, N., Asadi, P., Movahedpour, A., & Ghasemi, H. (2023). MicroRNA biosensors for detection of gastrointestinal cancer. Clinica Chimica Acta, 541, 117245.
Ghazvini, H. (2018). The host-pathogen interaction between barley and casual agent of spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana) disease: a review. Crop Breeding Journal, 8(2), 1-15.
Hakimian, F., & Ghourchian, H. (2020). Ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for detection of microRNA-155 as a breast cancer risk factor. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1136, 1-8.
Johnson, B. N., & Mutharasan, R. (2014). Biosensor-based microRNA detection: techniques, design, performance, and challenges. Analyst, 139(7), 1576–1588.
Kawakatsu, Y., Hara, M., Kurotani, K. I., Arima, A., Baba, Y., & Notaguchi, M. (2025). A multiplex microfluidic device to detect miRNAs for diagnosis of plant growth status. Horticulture Research, 12(3), uhae323.
Kim, E. R., Joe, C., Mitchell, R. J., & Gu, M. B. (2023). Biosensors for healthcare: Current and future perspectives. Trends in Biotechnology, 41(3), 374–395.
Li, J., Cupil-Garcia, V., Wang, H. N., Strobbia, P., Lai, B., Hu, J., Maiwald, M., Sumpf, B., Sun, T., Kemner, K. M., and Vo-Dinh, T. (2024). Plasmonics Nanorod Biosensor for In Situ Intracellular Detection of Gene Expression Biomarkers in Intact Plant Systems. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 261, 116471.
Luo, C., Bashir, N. H., Li, Z., Liu, C., Shi, Y., & Chu, H. (2024). Plant microRNAs regulate the defense response against pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, 1434798.
Mahdavi, Z., Dianati Daylami, S., Asefpour Vakilian, K., & Vahdati, K. (2025). Revolutionizing in vitro cultivation: Machine learning-based optimization of nutrients for superior morphology and biochemistry of Phalaenopsis orchids. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 161(2), 33.
Marabita, F., De Candia, P., Torri, A., Tegner, J., Abrignani, S., & Rossi, R. L. (2016). Normalization of circulating microRNA expression data obtained by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 17(2), 204–212.
Mohammadi, P., & Asefpour Vakilian, K. (2023). Machine learning provides specific detection of salt and drought stresses in cucumber based on miRNA characteristics. Plant Methods, 19, 123.
Mourya, D. T., Yadav, P. D., Mehla, R., Barde, P. V., Yergolkar, P. N., Kumar, S. R., Thakare, J. P., & Mishra, A. C. (2012). Diagnosis of Kyasanur forest disease by nested RT-PCR, real-time RT-PCR and IgM capture ELISA. Journal of Virological Methods, 186, 49–54.
Negahdary, M., & Angnes, L. (2022). Application of electrochemical biosensors for the detection of microRNAs (miRNAs) related to cancer. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 464, 214565.
Pan, L., Zhao, H., Yu, Q., Bai, L., & Dong, L. (2017). miR397/Laccase gene mediated network improves tolerance to fenoxaprop-P-ethyl in Beckmannia syzigachne and Oryza sativa. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 879.
Pan, Y., Peng, Y., Lu, Y., Yao, Y., Yu, W., & Li, C. (2025). Research techniques of miRNA and its regulatory network under biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. Plant Stress, 101103.
Pandey, R., Teig-Sussholz, O., Schuster, S., Avni, A., & Shacham-Diamand, Y. (2018). Integrated electrochemical Chip-on-Plant functional sensor for monitoring gene expression under stress. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 117, 493-500.
Pertermann, R., Golbik, R. P., Tamilarasan, S., Gursinsky, T., Gago-Zachert, S., Pantaleo, V., Thondorf, I., & Behrens, S. E. (2022). RNA and protein determinants mediate differential binding of miRNAs by a viral suppressor of RNA silencing thus modulating antiviral immune responses in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(9), 4977.
Pervaiz, T., Amjid, M. W., El-Kereamy, A., Niu, S. H., & Wu, H. X. (2021). MicroRNA and cDNA-microarray as potential targets against abiotic stress response in plants: Advances and prospects. Agronomy, 12(1), 11.
Rose, L. E., Overdijk, E. J., & van Damme, M. (2019). Small RNA molecules and their role in plant disease. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 154(1), 115-128.
Samadi, S. M., Asefpour Vakilian, K., & Javidan, S. M. (2025). A review of the most important microRNAs involved in fruit postharvest properties. Food Chemistry Advances, 9, 101168.
Seddaoui, N., & Arduini, F. (2025). Recent advances in wearable and implantable electrochemical (bio) sensors for plant health monitoring. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 191, 118336.
Sharbati, M., Asefpour Vakilian, K., & Azadbakht, M. (2025). What do microRNA concentrations tell us about the mechanical damage and storage period of strawberry fruits?. Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences, 10, 100250.
Sharma, N. K., Yadav, S., Gupta, S. K., Irulappan, V., Francis, A., SenthilKumar, M., & Chattopadhyay, D. (2023). MicroRNA397 regulates tolerance to drought and fungal infection by regulating lignin deposition in chickpea root. Plant, Cell & Environment, 46(11), 3501-3517.
Szweykowska-Kulinska, Z., & Jarmolowski, A. (2018). Post-transcriptional regulation of MicroRNA accumulation and function: new insights from plants. Molecular Plant, 11(8), 1006-1007.
Tran, H. V., & Piro, B. (2021). Recent trends in application of nanomaterials for the development of electrochemical microRNA biosensors. Microchimica Acta, 188(4), 128.
Turner, A. P. (2013). Biosensors: sense and sensibility. Chemical Society Reviews, 42, 3184–3196.
Várallyay, E., Burgyán, J., & Havelda, Z. (2008). MicroRNA detection by northern blotting using locked nucleic acid probes. Nature Protocols, 3(2), 190–196.
Veza, I., Spraggon, M., Fattah, I. R., & Idris, M. (2023). Response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing engine performance and emissions fueled with biofuel: Review of RSM for sustainability energy transition. Results in Engineering, 18, 101213.
Volná, A., Bartas, M., Pečinka, P., Špunda, V., & Červeň, J. (2022). What do we know about barley miRNAs?. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(23), 14755.
Wang, X., Ge, J., He, M., Li, Q., Cai, J., Zhou, Q., Zhong, Y., Wollenweber, B., & Jiang, D. (2023). Enhancing crop resilience: Understanding the role of drought priming in wheat stress response. Field Crops Research, 302, 109083.
Yin, J. Q., Zhao, R. C., & Morris, K. V. (2008). Profiling microRNA expression with microarrays. Trends in Biotechnology, 26(2), 70–76.
Zhang, Z., Long, Y., Yin, X., Wang, W., Li, W., Jiang, L., Chen, X., Wang, B., & Ma, J. (2023). Genome-wide identification and expression patterns of the laccase gene family in response to kiwifruit bacterial canker infection. BMC Plant Biology, 23(1), 591.
Zhou, Y., Ran, S., Wang, X., Huang, W., & Fang, Z. (2026). Enhancing Dendrobium huoshanense ZZ Tang & SJ Cheng tissue culture: a response surface methodology approach for robust plantlet regeneration. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 164(2), 53.
Volume 57, Issue 3
Summer 2026
Pages 55-69

  • Receive Date 04 March 2026
  • Revise Date 06 June 2026
  • Accept Date 21 June 2026