Comparing some soil pressure sinkage models for choosing the best one to predict sinkage of metal plates in clay loam soil

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 university of Tehran

2 mechanical Biosystems engineering

3 agricultural machinery engineering deparment

Abstract

Predicting the tire rolling resistance is an important issue in Agricultural Engineering, therefore, estimates it in different terms of vehicle performance is necessary. One of the rolling resistances predicting ways is to use models which are presented for pressure sinkage treatment of soil. In this study, the coefficient of each model has determined using MATLAB software, and then a comparison was made between them using two standards of correlation coefficient and root mean square error. The results showed that the Upadhyaya’s model with average Coefficient of determination of 0.9175 and average root mean square of 69.6211 has better accuracy in different moisture contents and bulk density. Also Gotteland and Benoit’s model with average Coefficient of determination of 0.7237 and average root mean square of 129.071 has less accuracy in predicting of sinkage value.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Bekker, M. G. (1971). Russian Approach to Terrain-Vehicle Systems. Final Report, Contract No. DAHC19-70-C-0019, US Army Research Office, Arlington, VA.
Gotteland, P., & Benoit, O. (2006). Sinkage tests for mobility study, modelling and experimental validation. Journal of terramechanics43(4), 451-467.
Khabbazi, A., Ghafoori, M., & Cheshomi, A. (2017). Experimental and laboratory assessment of clogging potential based on adhesion. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 1-12.
Lyasko, M. (2010). LSA model for sinkage predictions. Journal of Terramechanics47(1), 1-19.
Meirion-Griffith, G., & Spenko, M. (2013). A pressure-sinkage model for small-diameter wheels on compactive, deformable terrain. Journal of Terramechanics, 50(1), 37-44.
Okello, A. (1991). A review of soil strength measurement techniques for prediction of terrain vehicle performance. Journal of agricultural engineering research50, 129-155.
Rashidi, M., & Seyfi, K. (2008). Comparative studies on Bekker and Upadhyaya models for soil pressure-sinkage behavior prediction. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 3, 19-25.
Schuring, D. (1964). The mechanics of rigid wheels on soft ground. Journal of Terramechanics1(2), 5-21.
Upadhyaya, S. K., Wulfsohn, D., & Mehlschau, J. (1993). An instrumented device to obtain traction related parameters. Journal of Terramechanics30(1), 1-20.
Youssef, A. F. A., & Ali, G. A. (1982). Determination of soil parameters using plate test. Journal of Terramechanics19(2), 129-147.
Zeleke, G., Owende, P. M. O., Kanali, C. L., & Ward, S. M. (2007). Predicting the pressure–sinkage characteristics of two forest sites in Ireland using in situ soil mechanical properties. Biosystems engineering97(2), 267-281