Evaluating the environmental impacts of eggplant production in hydroponic greenhouse: implementing a circular bioeconomy approach through composting and biochar

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Faculty Member in Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

3 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

Despite its merits, hydroponics faces a significant volume of plant residues, including branches, leaves, and stems, after harvesting the main crop. If not managed properly, these residues can provide a suitable substrate for microbial growth, contributing to the proliferation of harmful microorganisms. To address the waste challenge, this research proposes the conversion of residues into compost or biochar based on a circular bioeconomy approach and investigates its environmental sustainability. According to the results, the production of one kilogram of hydroponic eggplant imposes health damages of 1.6×10-6 DALY on humans. Furthermore, in the ecisystems domain, the damage caused by producing one kilogram of hydroponic eggplant is equivalent to 1.08×10-8 species per year while in terms of resources, the estimated damage is $0.261 per kilogram of eggplant. The production and consumption of natural gas in hydroponic eggplant production play a vital role in environmental damages. The circular bioeconomy approach, especially the compost production pathway, there is a 16.6% reduction in health damages. In the ecosystem realm, the compost production pathway contributes to biodiversity conservation with a 16% reduction compared to the biochar production pathway, demonstrating better performance. In the resource damage category, the compost production pathway from green eggplant residues leads to approximately a 16% reduction compared to conventional hydroponic eggplant production. The results highlight the successful performance of eggplant production under the circular bioeconomy approach, focusing on compost production from green residues for environmental improvement and reduction of environmental damages in eggplant production.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Evaluating the environmental impacts of eggplant production in hydroponic greenhouse: implementing a circular bioeconomy approach through composting and biochar

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction

The recent global coronavirus outbreaks emphasize the crucial role of vitamins in boosting the human immune system. While fresh produce faces challenges in continuous availability, greenhouse cultivation, valued at $42.04 billion in 2023 and projected to reach $56.79 billion by 2028, offers a practical solution. However, traditional greenhouses raise sustainability concerns due to their heavy reliance on chemical pesticides. Hydroponic systems present an appealing alternative, reducing the need for chemicals. This research proposes an ecological-circular economic approach to manage agricultural waste in hydroponic systems, focusing on converting waste into compost or biochar. The approach aims for sustainability by utilizing renewable resources and fostering local development. The study, using the life cycle assessment (LCA) method, evaluates environmentaly the transition to a circular bioeconomy system in hydroponic eggplant cultivation, emphasizing the need for environmental compatibility before large-scale implementation.

Material and methods

This research focused on eggplant production under hydroponic systems, examining both conventional and circular bioeconomy approaches with a specific emphasis on compost and biochar production from eggplant green waste. The LCA method was employed to evaluate the environmental impacts of eggplant production under linear and circular bioeconomy systems. This approach offers a comprehensive assessment of the environmental effects throughout the entire life cycle of a product, from raw material extraction, through production and use, to disposal or recycling at the end of its life. The goal of this research as the first stege of an LCA was to investigate the environmental impacts of hydroponic eggplant production, transitioning from a linear economy to a circular bioeconomy under two pathways: compost and biochar. In the second stage, by documenting the environmental inputs and outputs throughout the eggplant life cycle, background and foreground information was collected from reliable sources. In the third stage, the environmental impact assessment was conducted using the ReCiPe method, revealing impacts at both midpoint and endpoint levels.

Results and discussion

The environmental analysis of producing one kilogram of eggplant under hydroponic conditions reveals a significant carbon footprint increase of 2.37 kilograms of carbon dioxide, with 69% attributed to the production and consumption of natural gas. Additionally, the production of fertilizers and the use of steel in greenhouse structures introduce harmful substances like trichlorofluoromethane. Addressing these challenges necessitates the implementation of strategies to enhance production technology and substitute materials with lower environmental impact. According to the results, the production of one kilogram of hydroponic eggplant imposes health damages of 1.6×10-6 DALY on humans. Furthermore, in the ecisystems domain, the damage caused by producing one kilogram of hydroponic eggplant is equivalent to 1.08×10-8 species per year while in terms of resources, the estimated total damage cost is $0.261 per kilogram.  Natural gas emerges as a significant contributor to these challenges, prompting recommendations for mitigating negative impacts through the adoption of sustainable energy sources and optimization of greenhouse heating systems. Furthermore, the benefits of eggplant production, adopting a circular bioeconomy approach and emphasizing compost production, are evident. This ecological-economic strategy results in reduced greenhouse gas emissions, ozone layer preservation, improved environmental and human health, reduced suspended particle production, and enhanced water and soil quality. A comparison between compost and biochar pathways reveals that compost production from green eggplant residues is more effective in mitigating negative impacts on human health, ecosystems, and resources. The results indicate that under the circular bioeconomy approach, especially the compost production pathway, there is a 16.6% reduction in health damages. Moreover, in the ecological realm, the compost production pathway contributes to biodiversity conservation with a 16% reduction compared to the biochar production pathway, demonstrating better performance. In the resource damage category, the compost production pathway from green eggplant residues leads to approximately a 16% reduction compared to conventional hydroponic eggplant production.

Conclusion

This study indicates that embracing circular bioeconomy approach, especially through compost production, proves effective in reducing environmental impacts of hydroponic eggplant. Comparing compost and biochar pathways underscores the superiority of compost production in mitigating negative impacts on health, ecosystems, and resources. A 16.6% reduction in health damages, ecosystems and resource damage reduction demonstrate the positive outcomes of transitioning from linear to circular bioeconomy practices through compost production vs. a 6% reduction through biochar production. In conclusion, adopting circular bioeconomy practices, particularly through compost utilization, provides a promising avenue for minimizing the environmental footprint of hydroponic eggplant cultivation, fostering sustainability and local development.

 

Balakrishnan, D., 2024. Exploring the potential of sugarcane vinasse for biogas and biofertilizer Production: A catalyst for advancing the bioeconomy. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 61, 103474.
Bayram, B., Greiff, K., 2023. Life cycle assessment on construction and demolition waste recycling: a systematic review analyzing three important quality aspects. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2023 1–23.
Bisbis, M.B., Gruda, N., Blanke, M., 2018. Potential impacts of climate change on vegetable production and product quality–A review. J. Clean. Prod. 170, 1602–1620.
Chakravarty, I., Mandavgane, S.A., 2023. Sequential bioprocessing of tomato waste-a biorefinery approach, in: Fruit and Vegetable Waste Utilization and Sustainability. Elsevier, pp. 121–138.
Daughtrey, M., Buitenhuis, R., 2020. Integrated pest and disease management in greenhouse ornamentals. Integr. pest Dis. Manag. Greenh. Crop. 625–679.
Dunlop, S.J., Arbestain, M.C., Bishop, P.A., Wargent, J.J., 2015. Closing the loop: Use of biochar produced from tomato crop green waste as a substrate for soilless, hydroponic tomato production. HortScience 50, 1572–1581.
Dunn, B., Bizhen, H., Dharti, T., 2021. Soilless Growing Mediums. Div. Agric. Sci. Nat. Resour. 1–7.
Flores, E.D., 2016. Energy use and CO2 emissions of eggplant production in the Philippines. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR J. 18, 138–148.
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Rehan, M., Nizami, A.-S., 2020. Determining key issues in life-cycle assessment of waste biorefineries, in: Waste Biorefinery. Elsevier, pp. 515–555.
ISO, 2006. 14040 International standard. Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment–Principles and Framework, International Organisation for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Tabatabaei, M., Ghanavati, H., Mohtasebi, S.S., Rahimi, V., Shafiei, M., Angelidaki, I., Karimi, K., 2017. Life cycle assessment of castor-based biorefinery: a well to wheel LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1–18.
Khounani, Z., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Moustakas, K., Talebi, A.F., Goli, S.A.H., Rajaeifar, M.A., Khoshnevisan, B., Jouzani, G.S., Peng, W., Kim, K.-H., 2021. Environmental life cycle assessment of different biorefinery platforms valorizing olive wastes to biofuel, phosphate salts, natural antioxidant, and an oxygenated fuel additive (triacetin). J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123916.
Kiehbadroudinezhad, M., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Pan, J., Peng, W., Wang, Y., Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., 2023a. The potential of aquatic weed as a resource for sustainable bioenergy sources and bioproducts production. Energy 278, 127871.
Kiehbadroudinezhad, M., Merabet, A., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., 2023b. A life cycle assessment perspective on biodiesel production from fish wastes for green microgrids in a circular bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. Reports 21, 101303.
Majid, M., Khan, J.N., Shah, Q.M.A., Masoodi, K.Z., Afroza, B., Parvaze, S., 2021. Evaluation of hydroponic systems for the cultivation of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L., var. Longifolia) and comparison with protected soil-based cultivation. Agric. Water Manag. 245, 106572.
Massironi, A., Biella, S., de Moura Pereira, P.F., Scibona, F., Feni, L., Sindaco, M., Emide, D., Jiménez-Quero, A., Bianchi, C.L.M., Verotta, L., 2023. Valorization of pumpkin seed hulls, cucurbitin extraction strategies and their comparative life cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 427, 139267.
Mendieta, O., Castro, L., Escalante, H., Garfí, M., 2021. Low-cost anaerobic digester to promote the circular bioeconomy in the non-centrifugal cane sugar sector: A life cycle assessment. Bioresour. Technol. 326, 124783.
Michiels, F., Hubo, L., Geeraerd, A., 2021. Why mass allocation with representative allocation factor is preferential in LCA when using residual livestock products as organic fertilizers. J. Environ. Manage. 297, 113337.
Mordor Intelligence, 2023. Commercial greenhouse market size & share analysis - growth trends & forecasts (2023 - 2028) [WWW Document]. Mordor Intell. URL https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/commercial-greenhouse-market
Nematian, M., Keske, C., Ng’ombe, J.N., 2021. A techno-economic analysis of biochar production and the bioeconomy for orchard biomass. Waste Manag. 135, 467–477.
Parajuli, R., Matlock, M.D., Thoma, G., 2021. Cradle to grave environmental impact evaluation of the consumption of potato and tomato products. Sci. Total Environ. 758, 143662.
Patchaye, M., Sundarkrishnan, B., Tamilselvan, S., Sakthivel, N., 2018. Microbial management of organic waste in agroecosystem. Microorg. Green Revolut. Vol. 2 Microbes Sustain. Agro-ecosystem 45–73.
Rosa-Martínez, E., García-Martínez, M.D., Adalid-Martínez, A.M., Pereira-Dias, L., Casanova, C., Soler, E., Figàs, M.R., Raigón, M.D., Plazas, M., Soler, S., 2021. Fruit composition profile of pepper, tomato and eggplant varieties grown under uniform conditions. Food Res. Int. 147, 110531.
Salehpour, T., Khanali, M., Rajabipour, A., 2020. Environmental impact assessment for ornamental plant greenhouse: Life cycle assessment approach for primrose production. Environ. Pollut. 266, 115258.
Salvador, R., Puglieri, F.N., Halog, A., de Andrade, F.G., Piekarski, C.M., Antonio, C., 2021. Key aspects for designing business models for a circular bioeconomy. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 124341.
Silva, W.R., de Carvalho Carregosa, J., Almeida-Couto, J.M.F., Cardozo-Filho, L., Wisniewski Jr, A., 2022. Management of de-oiled coffee beans biomass through pyrolysis process: Towards a circular bioeconomy. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 168, 105763.
Srivastava, R.K., Sarangi, P.K., Shadangi, K.P., Sasmal, S., Gupta, V.K., Govarthanan, M., Sahoo, U.K., Subudhi, S., 2023. Biorefineries development from agricultural byproducts: Value addition and circular bioeconomy. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 32, 100970.
Stylianou, M., Laifi, T., Bennici, S., Dutournie, P., Limousy, L., Agapiou, A., Papamichael, I., Khiari, B., Jeguirim, M., Zorpas, A.A., 2023. Tomato waste biochar in the framework of circular economy. Sci. Total Environ. 871, 161959.
Suh, S., Huppes, G., 2005. Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. J. Clean. Prod. 13, 687–697.
Taib, A.P., Alamhali, J.A., Tabal, E.P., 2021. Net energy use and carbon emission equivalent of tomato and eggplant production in Zamboanga City, Philippines. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Publ. 4, 73–78.
Wang, L., Ning, S., Zheng, W., Guo, J., Li, Youli, Li, Yinkun, Chen, X., Ben-Gal, A., Wei, X., 2023. Performance analysis of two typical greenhouse lettuce production systems: commercial hydroponic production and traditional soil cultivation. Front. Plant Sci. 14.
Yahia, E.M., García-Solís, P., Celis, M.E.M., 2019. Contribution of fruits and vegetables to human nutrition and health, in: Postharvest Physiology and Biochemistry of Fruits and Vegetables. Elsevier, pp. 19–45.
Yang, T., Kim, H.-J., 2020. Comparisons of nitrogen and phosphorus mass balance for tomato-, basil-, and lettuce-based aquaponic and hydroponic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 274, 122619.