بررسی راهبرد برون‌سپاری عملیات تهیه‌زمین برای کشت نیشکر (مطالعه‌ موردی: شرکت‌های کشت و صنعت دعبل خزاعی و امیرکبیر)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی، گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

3 استاد گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، ایران.

4 گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید جمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

چکیده:  نیشکر از گیاهان صنعتی مهم  در استان خوزستان است. با افزایش هزینه­های خرید، نگهداری و تعمیر ماشین­های کشاورزی، شرکت‌های کشت و صنعت نیشکر طی چند سال اخیر راهبرد برون­سپاری را در بخش­های مختلف به­خصوص در بخش عملیات کشاورزی، در پیش گرفته­اند. با توجه به اهمیت سه شاخص، به‌موقع انجام شدن عملیات کشاورزی، کیفیت و هزینه، این شاخص­ها در انجام کار توسط پیمانکار و شرکت در عملیات تهیه‌زمین شرکت­های کشت و صنعت نیشکر امیر کبیر و دعبل خزاعی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. اولویت­بندی شاخص­های مدنظر با توجه به نظر کارشناسان کشت و صنعت، نشان داد که مهم­ترین شاخص برای انجام عملیات تهیه زمین، کیفیت انجام عملیات است. جهت بررسی کیفیت عملیات تهیه زمین، شاخص برگردان خاک، قطر متوسط کلوخه و خردشدگی، همواری سطح شخم، عرض و عمق جوی و پشته اندازه­گیری شد. جهت بررسی زمان انجام عملیات، تقویم زراعی با روزهای واقعی انجام عملیات مقایسه گردید. بررسی هزینه­ها نیز، با جمع‌آوری اطلاعات هزینه­ای از شرکت­های مورد مطالعه انجام شد. در نهایت، شاخص­های مورد آزمون (در مزارع برون­سپاری شده و مزارع برون­سپاری نشده) به روش آزمون t برای نمونه­های مستقل مقایسه شد. با توجه به نتایج بین هزینه و زمان انجام عملیات پیمانکار و شرکت تفاوت معناداری وجود ندارد اما در شاخص کیفیت عملیات که مهم‌ترین شاخص برای شرکت­های تولید نیشکر است، کار پیمانکار بر کار شرکت برتری دارد. بنابراین انجام عملیات به­صورت برون­سپاری به سود شرکت­های کشت و صنعت مورد مطالعه، است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation the Effect of Outsourcing Strategy on the Land Preparation Operation in the Product Cultivation Sugarcane (Case study: Amirkabir Agro-industry and Debal Khazaei Agro-industry companies)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fatemeh Azizi 1
  • nasim monjezi 2
  • javad Sheikhdavoodi 3
  • Mohsen Soleymani 4
1 M.Sc. Student of Agricultural Mechanization, Biosystems engineering Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 Assistant professor, Biosystems engineering Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 professor, Biosystems engineering Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
4 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]

ABSTRACT: Sugarcane is one of the most important industrial plants in Khuzestan province. With the rising costs of purchasing, maintaining, agricultural machinery, sugarcane agribusinesses have been adopting outsourcing strategies in various sectors, especially in agricultural operations, over the last few years. Considering the importance of three criteria: cost, timely performance and quality in agricultural operations, these three criteria were evaluated in the work of contractor and company labor force in preparation in Amirkabir and Debal Khazaei agribusinesses. To investigate costs, cost information was obtained from the companies studied. The quality of operations was evaluated by field data collection and measurement of qualitative indices. Also, to check the timing of operations, the agricultural operations calendar was compared with actual days of work. Finally, the indices tested (in outsourced and non-outsourced farms) were compared using t-test for independent samples. The most important criterion for land acquisition operations in the agribusiness companies studied is the quality of operations. The results of the comparisons also showed that there is no significant difference between the cost and time of the contractor and corporate force operations but in terms of quality, which is the most important criterion for agribusinesses, contractor workforce outweighs corporate workforce. Therefore, outsourcing operations are for the benefit of the studied companies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cost
  • Quality
  • Timely operation
  • Sugarcane
Adam, K. M. & Erbach, D. C. (1992). Secondary tillage tool effect on soil aggregation. Transactions of the ASAE, 35(6), 1771-1776.
Ahmadi, A. (2016). The relationship between creativity and innovation with human productivity. New Approach in Educational Management, 7 (27), 209-222. (In Farsi)
Ahmadizadeh, E., Tajvar, M. & Ahmadi, B. (2020). Reviewing the status and experience of outsourcing policy in healthcare: A review study. Management Strategies in Health System, 4 (4), 350-359. (In Farsi)
Almasi, M., Kiani, Sh. & Luveimi, N. (2014). Principles of agricultural mechanization (Principles and Applications). Fifth Edition, The Discourse of Contemporary Thought, Isfahan. pp: 141-177. (In Farsi)
Asadi, R., Etemadian, M., Shadpour, P. & Semnani, F. (2018). Designing a model of selection and assessment of hospital outsourcing services based on approach hierarchical possess (AHP) in hospitals. Journal of Hospital, 16 (4), 9-18. (In Farsi)
Azadi, H., Houshyar, E., Zarafshani, K., Hosseininia, G. & Witlox, F. (2013). Agricultural outsourcing: A two-headed coin? Global and Planetary Change, 100, 20-27.
Bagherzadeh Azar, M. & Zahedi Barough, S. (2020). Investigating the moderating role of management processes on the relationship between outsourcing and performance. 8th International Conference on Research in Management, Economics and Development, 18 November, Georgia. (In Farsi)
Barat Shoushtari, M., Ahmadian, S. & Asfia, Gh. (2008). Cane in Iran. Second Edition, AJIJ Publications, Tehran, pp: 100-210. (In Farsi)
Beaumont, N. & Sohal, A. (2004). Outsourcing in australia. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24 (7), 688-700.
Dean Elmuti. (2004). The perceived impact of outsourcing on organizational performance. American Journal of Business, 18(2), 33-42.
Fontes, R. (2000). The outsource option. Management Magazine, 20 (11), 3-112. 
Frayer, J. K., Scannell, J. D. & Thomas, V. (2000). An empirical investigation of global sourcing strategy effectiveness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36 (1), 29-38.
Gilley, K. M., Greer, C. R. & Rasheed, A. A. (2004). Human resource outsourcing and organizational performance in manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Research, 57 (3), 232-240.
Harler, C. (2000). Opting for outsourcing. Business Communications Review, 30 (7), 56-61.
Hosseini Golfshani, A. & Rahimi, A. (2011). The effectiveness of outsourcing projects of Islamic Azad University as a Cultural Institution (Case Study: Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch). Cultural Management, 5 (1), 34-43. (In Farsi)
Hung Lau, K. & Zhang, J. (2006). Drivers and obstacles of outsourcing practices in China. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 36 (10), 776-792.
Kazemi, H. & Farrokh Nia, V. (2011). Investigation of factors affecting successful outsourcing based on cost index in water and wastewater industry. International Conference on Water and Wastewater. (In Farsi)
Machila, M., Lyne, M. & Nuthall, P. L. (2015). Assessment of an outsourced agricultural extension service in the Mutasa district of Zimbabwe. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 7 (5), 142-149.
Mohaghegh, B., Asadbeigi, M., Barati Marnani, A. & Birjandi, M. (2011). The impact of outsourcing of rural health centers on Patients' Satisfaction. Hospital Research Quarterly, 10 (3), 79-88. (In Farsi)
Mohanty, R. P., Mishra, D. & Mishra, T. (2009). Comparative study of production outsourcing models. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 6 (1), 41-69.
Monjezi, N., Sheikh Davodi, M. J., Zaki Dizaji, H., Marzban, A. & Shomeili, M. (2017). Identification and prioritization of factors affecting failure to perform sugarcane production operations in a timely manner using hierarchical analysis (AHP). Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 7 (2), 514-526.
Moschuris, S. J. & Kondylis, M. N. (2006). Outsourcing in public hospitals: a Greek perspective. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 20 (1), 4-14.
Nayebzadeh, Sh., Morvati Sharifabadi, A. & Golshani, M. (2013). Investigating the role of an accounting unit in making outsourcing organizational decisions. Journal of Management Accounting, 6 (18), 73-85. (In Farsi)
Prola, R. F. (2004). Hands across the sea. Smith Business, 5 (2), 5-7.
Sedaghat Hosseini, M., & Saebiefard, H. (2006). Testing and evaluation of agricultural machinery and equipment: Principles and applications. Writing by Frank M. Inez. Fourth Edition, Agricultural Education Publication, Tehran, pp: 326-334. (In Farsi)
Sharifi, S., Monjezi, N. and Hafezi, N. (2021). Performance of multilayer perceptron neural network models and radial-based functions in estimation of sugar-cane crop yield. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 30 (4), 213-228. (In Farsi)
Smith, D. W., Sims, B. G. & O'Neill, D. H. (1994). Testing and evaluation of agricultural machinery and equipment: principles and practices. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin (FAO).
Zand Vakili, B., Bahadori, A., Saudi, J., Saeedi, A., Heydarian, SH. & Karami, A. (2015). Cane from experience to standard. First Edition, Kordegar Publishing, Ahvaz, pp: 56-93. (In Farsi)
Zhang, X., Yang, J. & Thomas, R. (2017). Mechanization outsourcing clusters and division of labor in Chinese agriculture. China Economic Review, 43, 184-195.