شناسایی و تحلیل پیشران‌های توسعه کشاورزی حفاظتی در استان آذربایجان شرقی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی مکانیزاسیون کشاورزی، گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، شهر تبریز، ایران

2 گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، شهر تبریز، ایران

چکیده

مسئله فرسایش خاک در کشورهای در حال توسعه به مراتب شدیدتر از کشورهای توسعه یافته است. لازم است به علت انجام کشاورزی سنتی در بین کشاورزان، با توجه به هزینه زیاد نسبت به سود آن، کشاورزی حفاظتی به هدف اصلی تبدیل شده و تحقیقاتی در این زمینه صورت گیرد. لذا در گام اول پیشران‌های توسعه کشاورزی حفاظتی شناسایی شدند. این کار به روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی منابع و انجام مصاحبه با متخصصان و صاحب‌نظران حاصل از 22 مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته در استان آذربایجان شرقی انجام شده است. در گام دوم پیشران‌ها رتبه‌بندی و گروه‌بندی شدند. در گام سوم برای طراحی الگو از روش الگو‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری جهت تعیین سطح پیشران‌های اصلی شناسایی و روابط درونی بین پیشران‌ها استفاده شد. جامع و الگوی پیشران‌ها طراحی شدند و بعد از تشکیل کمیته‌ی فنی متشکل از 6 نفر با کارشناسان در بخش تحلیل پیشران‌های حاصل از تحلیل محتوای متن مصاحبه‌ها در مرحله کدگذاری اولیه، 37 عامل پیشران برای توسعه کشاورزی حفاظتی مشخص شدند، کدهای اولیه در هشت گروه اصلی شامل سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی، ساختاری و نهادی، حمایتی و مالی، نظارت و ارزیابی، فرهنگ‌سازی، بازار نهاده و زیر ساختی، تحقیق و توسعه و ترویجی و آموزشی طبقه‌بندی شدند. با استفاده از روش الگوسازی ساختاری تفسیری، هشت پیشران اصلی شناسایی شده و با ترسیم الگوی پیشران‌ها، پیشران‌های توسعه کشاورزی و حفاظتی در چهار سطح قرار گرفتند. در سطح یک الگو پیشران بازار نهاده و زیرساختی به‌عنوان پایه و ریشه اصلی الگوی پیشران‌های کشاورزی حفاظتی قرار گرفت. به عبارتی توسعه کشاورزی حفاظتی بیش از هر پیشران دیگر نیازمند این عامل است و این عامل به عنوان پایه است. پیشران‌های (سیاست‌گذاری و برنامه‌ریزی، ساختاری و نهادی، فرهنگ‌سازی، تحقیق و توسعه و ترویجی و آموزشی) در سطح دوم طراحی الگو قرار گرفتند و مشخص شد بین آن‌ها ارتباط قوی وجود دارد، همچنین در سطح سوم طراحی الگو، پیشران حمایتی و خدماتی قرار گرفت و در سطح چهارم نیز پیشران نظارت و ارزیابی مشخص شد. نتایج تحقیقات نشان از تأثیر این عامل بر پذیرش توسعه کشاورزی حفاظتی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Barriers to the Development of Conservation Agriculture in East Azarbaijan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fakhroddin khamoushi 1
  • adel Taheri Hajivand 2
1 Master's student in Agricultural Mechanization Engineering, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz city, Iran
چکیده [English]

 
The problem of soil erosion in developing countries is much more severe than in developed countries. It is necessary to carry out traditional agriculture among farmers, considering the high cost compared to its profit, conservation agriculture has become the main goal and research should be done in this field. Therefore, in the first step, the drivers of conservation agriculture development are identified. This work was done by analyzing the qualitative content of sources and conducting interviews with experts and experts from 22 semi-structured interviews in the province. In the second step, the propellants were ranked and grouped. In the third step, the interpretative structural modeling method was used to determine the level of the main driving forces and the internal relationships between the driving forces. Comprehensive and model drivers were designed and after the formation of a technical committee consisting of 6 people with experts in the driver analysis department, as a result of the content analysis of the interviews in the initial coding stage, 37 driver factors for the development of conservation agriculture were determined, the initial codes in Eight main groups including policy and planning, structural and institutional, support and financial, monitoring and evaluation, culture building, input market and infrastructure, research and development, promotional and educational were classified. Using interpretive structural modeling method, the eight identified main drivers were placed in four levels. At the first level of the input market and infrastructure, the development of protective agriculture requires these factors as a base. The research results show the effect of this factor on the acceptance of conservation agriculture development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • East Azerbaijan
  • Driving factors
  • sustainable agriculture
  • conservation agriculture

Analysis of Barriers to the Development of Conservation Agriculture in East Azarbaijan province

EXTENDED ABSTRACT

Introduction

The importance of conservation agriculture (CA) in mitigating poverty is ensuring food security, and addressing challenges posed by climate change and increasing energy demands. CA aims to preserve soil fertility, reduce production costs, and enhance moisture retention, thereby improving agricultural productivity sustainably. It promotes practices such as permanent soil cover, minimal soil disturbance, and crop diversity, facilitating timely operations and enhancing rainfed and irrigated agriculture.

Various factors influence farmers' acceptance and participation in soil protection measures, including awareness, education, income, land characteristics, and access to resources and services. Studies have investigated these factors in different contexts, highlighting their significance in adopting sustainable soil management practices.

The study aims to identify factors influencing CA development in East Azarbaijan province through qualitative content analysis, expert interviews, and interpretive structural modeling. The goals include identifying drivers of CA development, ranking them, and designing a model to understand their relationships and levels of influence.

Materials and Methods

 The current research was started in the fall of 1400 in East Azarbaijan province to identify and evaluate the factors driving the development of conservation agriculture. First, the qualitative content analysis method was used, the reason for that is the possibility it provides for regular analysis of information and deeper and more complex comments such as semi-guided interview reports. According to a number of experts, content analysis is quantitative in terms of the nature of research through which the qualitative content of sources is examined. This method was first used in communication sciences and is currently used in the analysis of various texts. In content analysis, the researcher analyzes the generated messages and seeks to find answers to his research questions. Content analysis is a suitable method to answer questions in and around the content of a message (Iman and Noushadi, 2019). Also, in the model design stage, an interpretation of the structural modeling method for the barriers to the development of conservation agriculture in East Azerbaijan province has been done. In this method, the effective and essential factors are first identified, and then, using the presented method, the relationships between these factors and the way to achieve progress are presented by them. The ISM method analyzes the relationship between indicators by analyzing the criteria at several different levels. The interpretive structure model is able to determine the relationship between indicators that are individually or collectively dependent on each other. This method analyzes the relationship between indicators by analyzing the criteria in several different levels. The ISM method can be used to analyze the relationship between multivariate attributes defined for a problem (Suti et al., 2010).

Results and Discussion

Based on the results obtained from the content analysis of the interviews, 37 driving factors for the development of conservation agriculture were identified in the initial coding stage. After the merging of the codes that were similar in nature, the primary codes were divided into eight main groups, including policy and planning, structural and institutional, support and financial, monitoring and evaluation, culture building, market input and infrastructure, research and development. and promotional and educational were classified. Among the primary codes, the most frequency is related to Pishran, attracting the cooperation of universities and educational centers for conservation agriculture training (culturalization), allocating credits for farmers to buy special tools (support and financing) and using packages and plans. Incentives to motivate the development of conservation agriculture (planning at the provincial and regional level) are in studies (Friedrich et al., 2009), (Kasem and Friedrich., 2011), (Ngendu et al., 2013). , (Latifi et al. 2018), the importance of conservation agriculture development drivers has been mentioned.

Conclusion

 Using interpretive structural modeling method, the eight identified main drivers were placed in four levels. At the first level of the input market and infrastructure that the development of protective agriculture requires these factors as a base; The results of most researches show the effect of this factor on the adoption of conservation agriculture development in African countries (Ray et al., 2011). The drivers (policy and planning, structural and institutional, culture building, research and development, promotional and educational) were placed in the second level of model design and it was found that there is a strong relationship between them. Also, in the third level of model design, support and service drivers were placed, and in the fourth level, monitoring and evaluation drivers were identified. Based on the results of the analysis and investigation of the driving force and dependence of the drivers of conservation agriculture development, based on the results obtained from the drivers of conservation agriculture development, the input and infrastructure market drivers (D6) are placed at the level of dependent variables (II). took This propellant has a strong dependency and a weak lead, and basically it has a high impact and a small impact on the system. Also, policy and planning drivers (D1), structural and institutional (D2), culture building (D5), research and development (D7), promotional and educational (D8), support and financial (D3) and Monitoring and evaluation (D4), in the group of linking factors (III), were placed with a high dependence force and a high driving force and have a high dependence on other drivers. So that any action regarding these factors will affect other drivers. There will also be a feedback effect on it.

Abdollahzadeh, G., Azhdarpour, A., & Sharif Sharifzadeh, M. (2018). Investigating Rural People Perceptions of Climate Changes and Adaptation Strategies in Zabol County. Geography and Environmental Planning, 28(4), 85-106
Abdullahzadeh, G. Farahani, N. & Shirizadeh. M. 1396. Factors influencing the adoption of protective methods in soil erosion control (study of garden lands in Chehlchai watershed). Journal of environmental erosion research, 7(1), 50-68. (in persian)
Abedi, S., Yazdani, S., Salehov, A., Salami, H. & Jahansuzef, M. R. 2013. Analysis of factors affecting the adoption of conservation agriculture in Fars province. Economic research and agricultural development of Iran. (in persian)
Abedi, S., Yazdani, S., Saleh, A. Salami, H. & Jahansoz, M. 2013. Analysis of factors affecting the adoption of conservation agriculture in Fars province. Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran, 45(2), 247-255. (in persian)
Abrol, I.P. & Sangar, S. 2006. Sustaining Indian agriculture - conservation agriculture the way forward. Current Science, 91(8), 1020-1025.
Adamu, G.K. Maharaz, A.Y. & Mohammed, A. (2014). Soil degradation in dry lands. Academic Research International, 5(1), 78-91.
Agazadeh, M.Asgari ,T. shahi,E. And farhamed, A. 1394. Design a process model for formulating the strategy of governance organizations based on the network governance paradigm. The management of government agencies, 4 (1), 27-56.(in persian)
Agriculture adoption and diffusion in Zambia: A dynamic perspective. The 32nd
Ahuja, V., Yang, J. & Shankar, R. (2009). Benefits of collaborative ICT adoption for building project management. Construction Innovation, 9(3), 323-340.
Alipour, H.  & Alizadeh, N. 2017. Analysis of effective mechanisms on conservation agriculture in the direction of optimal water management in irrigated wheat farmers of Kermanshah province, 7(4), 55-68. (in persian)
Amelia, D.F., Kopainsky, B. & Nyanga, P.H. (2014). Exploratory model of conservation
Arabi, H. & Khademi, H. 2013. Organic agriculture, the face of agriculture in the future, an overview of the role of extension in agricultural development. (in persian)
Azar, A. & Fergie, H. 1389. Fuzzy Management Science. Tehran: kindly published.(in persian)
Basch, G., Kassam, A., González-Sánchez, E.J., & Streit, B. (2012). Making sustainable agriculture real in CAP 2010.
Baudron, F., Mwanza, H., Triomphe, B., & Bwalya, M. (2007). Conservation agriculture in Zambia: a case study of Southern Province. ‏
Bell, R. W., Haque, M., Jahiruddin, M., Rahman, M., Begum, M., Miah, M. A., & Mahmud, M. N. H. Conservation agriculture for rice-based intensive cropping by smallholders in the eastern Gangetic plain. . (2019) Agriculture, 9(1), 5. ‏
Bellotti, B. & Rochecouste, J.F. (2014). The development of conservation agriculture in Australia-farmers as innovators. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2(1), 21-34.
Borsy, P., Gadea, R. & Vera Sosa, E. (2013). Forest Management and Conservation Agriculture: Experiences of smallholder farmers in the eastern region of Paraguay. Integrated Crop Management, 18, 192.
Brouder, S.M. & Gomez-Macpherson, H. (2014). The impact of conservation agriculture on smallholder agricultural yields: A scoping review of the evidence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 187, 11-32.
Brown, B., Llewellyn, R., & Nuberg, I. (2018). Global learnings to inform the local adaptation of conservation agriculture in Eastern and Southern Africa. Global Food Security, 17, 213-220. ‏
Calegari, A., Araújo, A.G., Costa, A., Lanillo, R.F, Junior, R.C. & Santos, D.R. (2014). Conservation Agriculture in Brazil. In: Jat, R.A., Sahrawat, K.L. and Kassam, A.H. Conservation Agriculture: Global Prospects and Challenges. Pp. 54-88.
Chinseu, E. L., Stringer, L. C., & Dougill, A. J. (2019). An empirically derived conceptual framework to assess dis-adoption of conservation agriculture: Multiple drivers and institutional deficiencies. Journal of Sustainable Development, 12(5), 48-64. ‏
Chompolola, A. & Kaonga, O. (2016). Adoption of Conservation Agriculture in Zambia: The Case of Chongwe District. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(3), 77-86.
Colmenero, M. R, Bienes, R., Eldridge, D. J. & Marques, M. J. (2013). Vegetation cover reduces erosion and enhances soil organic carbon in a vineyard in the central Spain. CATENA, 104, 153-160.
Corbeels, M., Thierfelder, C. & Rusinamhodzi, L. (2015). Conservation Agriculture in Sub Saharan Africa. In: Farooq, M. & Siddique, K.H.M. Conservation Agriculture, Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. Pp. 443-477.
D’Silva, J.L., Abu Samah, B., Uli, J., & Hayrol Azril. M.S. (2011). Acceptance of sustainable agricultural practices: The case of crop farmers. American journal of agricultural and biological sciences, 6, 227-230.
Department of Sustainable Agricultural Development, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad. 1380. Sustainable development strategy conference in executive departments of the country. National Committee for Sustainable Development of Tehran. Warsi, H. Taqvai, M. Sharifi, M. (2014). (in persian)
Derpsch, R. & Friedrich, T. (2009). Global overview of conservation agriculture adoption. 4th world congress on conservation agriculture, New Delhi, India. PP. 429-438.
Diabat, A. & Govindan, K. (2011). An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55, 659-667.
Díaz-José, J., Rendón-Medelb, R., Govaertsc, B., Aguilar-Ávilab, J. & Muñoz Rodriguez, M. (2015). Innovation Diffusion in Conservation Agriculture: A Network Approach. European Journal of Development Research.
Dougill, A.J., Whitfield, S., Stringer, L.C., Vincent, K., Wood, B.T., Chinseu, E.L., Steward, P. & Mkwambisi, D.D. (2017). Mainstreaming conservation agriculture in Malawi: Knowledge gaps and institutional barriers. Journal of Environmental Management, 195(1), 25-34.
Erfani Far, S., Zibae, M. & Kasraei, M. 2014. Investigating socio-economic factors affecting the adoption of new technologies of conservation tillage in Darab region (application of multi-option logit model). Journal of Conservation Agriculture Economics and Development. (in persian)
European Conservation Agriculture Federation. (2005). Available at: http://www.ecaf.org.
FAO, 2001a. Conservation agriculture case studies in Latin America and Africa. Introduction. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 78. FAO, Rome.
FAO, (2008). Investing in sustainable crop intensification: The case for soil health. Report of the international technical workshop, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
FAO, (2009). Global agriculture towards 2050. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
FAO, 2011a. Socio-economic analysis of conservation agriculture in Southern Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome,Italy.
FAO, 2013a. Basic Principles of Conservation Agriculture. In: http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/1a.html (accessed 10.14).
Fartukzadeh, H. & Vazirif, J. 2018. Analysis of the institutional environment of innovation in the transition to the defense industries of tomorrow. Management thought. (in persian)
Findlater, K. M., Kandlikar, M., & Satterfield, T. (2019). Misunderstanding conservation agriculture: Challenges in promoting, monitoring and evaluating sustainable farming. Environmental Science & Policy, 100, 47-54. ‏
Friedrich, T. & Kassam, A.H. (2009). Adoption of Conservation Agriculture Technologies: Constraints and Opportunities. Invited paper at the IV World Congress on Conservation Agriculture. 4 -7 February (2009), New Delhi, India
Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R. & Kassam, A. (2012). Global overview of the spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports, 6, 1-7.
Friedrich, T., Kassam, A. & Corsi, S. (2014). Conservation Agriculture in Europe. In: Jat, R.A., Sahrawat, K.L. and Kassam, A.H. Conservation Agriculture: Global Prospects and Challenges. Pp.127-179.
 Hobbs, P., Lugandu, S., & Harrington, L. (2014). Policy and institutional arrangements for the promotion of conservation agriculture for small farmers in Asia and Africa. Paper presented at the Conference on Conservation agriculture for Smallholders (CASH) in Asia and Africa, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Hobbs, P., Sayre, K. & Gupta, R. (2008). The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363(1491), 543-555.
Hobbs, P.R. & Govaerts, B. (2010). How conservation agriculture can contribute to buffering climate change. In: Reynolds, M. (Eds.), Climate change and crop production. CABI Climate Change Series, Vol. 1. CABI, Cambridge, Pp. 177–199.
Hosseini, S. M. & Sharifzadeh, A. 1394. Sustainable agriculture: the new paradigm of agricultural research and development. Published by jihad University, Tehran. (in persian)
Hosseini, S. M. & Sharifzadeh, A. 1393. Knowledge-based development of Agriculture  Knowledge Management, Technology and innovation in agriculture. Published by jihad University, Tehran. (in persian)
Hsu, Y.L., Lee, C.H. & Kreng, V.B. (2010). The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 419-425.
Imami, J. 1397. The book challenges of the development of conservation agriculture and its solutions.(in persian)
Jafari, A. Mahluji, M. salhif, M. & twelve imams, S. 1386. Principles, foundations and challenges of organic farming. Sustainable agriculture, 3 (4), 19-13. (in persian)
Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., & Derpsch, R. (2019). Global spread of conservation agriculture. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 76(1), 29-51.
‏ Kochaki, A., Hosseini, M. & Hashemi Dezfuli, A. 2016. Sustainable agriculture. Publications University of Mashhad. (in persian)
Latifi, S., Rahli, H., Yadavar, H. & Saadi Shahrashtani, A. 2017. Identifying and explaining the implementation stages of conservation agriculture development in Iran with the fuzzy Delphi approach. Biosystem Engineering of Iran, 49(1), 107-120. (in persian)
Latifi, S., Rahli, H., Yadavar, H. & Saadi 2017. Designing the model of conservation agriculture development process in Iran using interpretive structural modeling approach. Economic Research and Agricultural Development of Iran, 49(1), 105-120.(in persian)
Latifi, S., Rahli, H., Yadavar, H. & Saadi, H. 2016. Identification and analysis of the development drivers of conservation agriculture in Iran. Extension Sciences and Agricultural Education, 13(1), 105-125. (in persian)
Latifi, S., Rahli, H., Yadavar, H. & Saadi, H. 2016. Analysis of the barriers to the development of conservation agriculture in Iran. Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 26(4), 167-184. (in persian)
Mahmoudi, H., Mahdavi Damghani, A. M. & Liaqati, H. 2017. An income on organic agriculture. Publications University of Mashhad. (in persian)
Monjardino, M., Ridaura, S. L., Van Loon, J., Mottaleb, K. A., Kruseman, G., Zepeda, A., ... & Erenstein, O. (2021). Disaggregating the Value of Conservation Agriculture to Inform Smallholder Transition to Sustainable Farming: A Mexican Case Study. Agronomy, 11(6), 1214. ‏
Momeni Chalaki, D., Hayati, B., Dashti, Q. & Mohammad Rezaei, R. 2013. Factors affecting the acceptance of mechanical soil protection operations in the rainfed lands of Izeh city. Agricultural research and development of Iran.(in persian)
Nahid, N. & Kerami, A. 2013. Determinants of plant residue management in Morodasht city. Extension sciences and agricultural education of Iran. (in persian)
Pezeshki rad, G. 1381. Overview of the concepts of sustainable agriculture. Promoters magazine. Number 14.(in persian)
Saei ahan, J. Ghasipur, H. & Mohammadi Asadi, N.،  1388. Comprehensive Plan of conservation agriculture. Deputy Minister of plant birth affairs of the Ministry of agricultural jihad, Tehran. (in persian)
Salehi, S. Rezai Moghadam, K. & Agili, A. 1387. Application of performance monitoring technology: a model for Sustainable Agriculture. Agricultural Promotion and Education Sciences.(in persian)
Savari, M. Sherry, N. & Shaban Ali, H. 1396. Analysis of factors influencing the use of conservation farming operations by farmers (case study: devandere city). Scientific quarterly-Regional Planning Research, 5 (20), 177-190. (in persian)
Shiri Nemat alah, S. M. Mirkzadeh, A. & Ishaq, S. R. 1392. Factors influencing the use of soil protection operations by farmers in Elam. Iranian agricultural economics and Development Research. (in persian)
Spatial analysis & optimal location of urban green spaces (case example: Najafabad city). Scientific quarterly-research research and Urban Planning, 6 (21), 51-72. (in persian)
Toshih, & .Cadri, M. H. Rezaei, L. & Kohsar Bastani, M. 1389. Conservation agriculture, sustainability index of production and reduction of chemical fertilizer consumption in wheat cultivation. The first congress of fertilizer challenges in Iran. Water and soil Research Institute. (in persian)
Vice President of Plant Production Affairs, Ministry of Agricultural Jihad. 2013. Conservation Agriculture Plan  Explanation-Technical-Economic Report). Ministry of Agriculture.(in persian)
zare, sh. & Movaiedi, A. 1398. Economic evaluation of agricultural rotations in the conservation agriculture of the temperate-cold region of Mashhad. Agricultural ecology, 11 (1), 33-51. (in persian).