بررسی و انتخاب مهمترین پارامترهای مؤثر در چابکی زنجیره توزیع تعاونی کمباین‌داران استان فارس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

زنجیره تأمین، شبکه‌ای از واحدهاست که برای تولید و تحویل کالاها و خدمات از تأمین­کنندگان شروع شده و به مشتریان ختم می­شود و هدف آن کاهش هزینه­ها و افزایش سطح خدمت‌دهی است. تعاونی کمباین­داران به­عنوان توزیع کننده ماشین­های کشاورزی نقش مهمی در کاهش ضایعات ناشی از تأخیر در برداشت دارند. حساسیت محصولات کشاورزی در شرایط محیطی که دائماً در حال تغییر است ضرورت واکنش­های مناسب تعاونی­ها را دو چندان کرده است. لازمه واکنش مؤثر به این تغییرات، دست­یابی به چابکی است. در این پژوهش پارامترهای چابکی، در مطالعات پیشین شناخته شد. پرسش‌نامه‌ای به منظور شناسایی مهم­ترین پارامترهای چابکی در زنجیره توزیع تعاونی تهیه و تکمیل گردیده و با استفاده از روش آنتروپی - مجموع ساده وزین رتبه‌بندی شدند، که پس از محاسبه A*، سه پارامتر حساسیت و پاسخگویی به بازار و مشتری، سرعت انجام کار و معرفی محصول جدید با مقدار 08620/0 در درجه اول اهمیت قرار گرفتند و برنامه­ریزی صحیح، کاهش هزینه‌ها، ادغام وظیفه­ها و فرآیند، به­کارگیری IT، رضایت مشتری، انعطاف­پذیری، کیفیت انجام خدمات و توسعه مهارت­های کارکنان به ترتیب با مقادیر 082328/0، 077243/0، 074230/0، 073355/0، 071509/0، 069464/0، 065749/0 و 063601/0 در رتبه دوم تا نهم قرار گرفتند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation and selection of the most important parameters in the distribution chain agility Combine Owners Cooperative Fars province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Sharifi
  • Asadollah Akram
  • Najmeh Tavakoli
University Of Tehran
چکیده [English]

The aim of supply chain is to reduce cost and increase service level. Distribution has an important role in supply chain management. Combine owners cooperative has an important role in reducing wastages before harvest due to delay. Agriculture products are sensitive to an environment that is changing constantly, since, needs for appropriate reactions of cooperatives has doubled. Requirement for respond effectively to these changes is to achieve agility. In this research agility criteria identified from previous studies. A Questionnaire was prepared and completed in order to identify the most important measures for agility of cooperative distribution chain. The important agility criteria were identified and were rated by using SAW method which after calculating A*, three parameters including sensitive and responsive to the market and customers, speed of work and introduction of a new product with value of 0.08620 were concern primarily and correct planning, reduce costs, and consolidate tasks and process, using IT, customer satisfaction, flexibility, quality of services and the development of staff skills values are 0.082328, 0.077243, 0.074230, 0.073355, 0.071509, 0.069464, 0.065749 and 0.063601 respectively and were in second place to ninth.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Supply Chain
  • agility model
  • reduce cost
  • increase service level
Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain; Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 443-457.
Angilella, S., Currents, S., Greco, S., Słowiński, R. (2014). MUSA-INT: Multi criteria customer satisfaction analysis with interacting criteria. Omega, 42, 189-200.
Asadi, H. Pirayesh far, Mostofi, M. (2006). Studying economic value of wheat losses according to available researches.  Agricultural engineering and natural resources, 4 (14), 46. (In Farsi)
Asgharpour, M. J. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making, Published by university of Tehran. (In Farsi)
Denpontion, M., Mascarola, H., Spronk, J. (1983). A user oriented listing of MCDM. Revue Beige de Researche Operationelle, 23, 3-11.
Fathi-Ashtiyani, A. (2010). Psychological tests, Tehran. (In Farsi)
Gillis, W., Castrogiovanni, G. J. (2012). The franchising business model: an entrepreneurial growth alternative. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), 75-98.
Gunasekaran, A., Lai, K. H., Cheng, T. E. (2008). Responsive supply chain: a competitive strategy in a networked economy. Omega, 36(4), 549-564.
Helo, P., Xiao, Y., Roger Jiao, J. (2006). A web-based logistics management system for agile supply demand network design. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(8), 1058-1077.
Hobbs, B. F. (1986). What can we learn from experiments in multi objective decision analysis? IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 16(3), 384-394.
Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 186). Springer Science & Business Media.
Lin, H. F., Chen, C. H. (2013). An intelligent embedded marketing service system based on TV apps: Design and implementation through product placement in idol dramas. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 4127-4136.
Martelo, S., Barroso, C., Cepeda, G. (2013). The use of organizational capabilities to increase customer value. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2042-2050.
Nouri. gh, Tabatabaeiyan. S. (2006). Analyzing sensitivity of multi-criteria decision making issues respect to used method. (In Farsi)
Power, D. J., Sohal, A. S., Rahman, S. U. (2001). Critical success factors in agile supply chain management-An empirical study. International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 31(4), 247-265.
Salami, A., Shahbaz Moradi, S., Bamdad Soofi, J. (2008). The design and construction of large-scale research approach with a total score of Likert in the management. Journal of science management. Spring . N80. (In Farsi)
Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W., Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of industrial ergonomics, 37(5), 445-460.
Soltan-Panah, H., Farughi, H. Golabi, M. (2010). Approaching and comparing multi-criteria decision making methods in country ranking based on human developing. Journal of science and technology.  (In Farsi)
Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170-188.
Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288-297.
Tizro, A. Azar, A. Ahmadi, R., Rafiee, M. (2011). Presentation agility model of the Zob ahan stock supply chain. Journal of Industrial management, 3(7), 17-36. (In Farsi)
White, D. J. (1982). Multiple Attribute Decision Making–A State-of-the-Art Survey. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 33(3), 289-289.
Yeung, A. C. (2008). Strategic supply management, quality initiatives, and organizational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 490-502.
 Zhang, H., Fu, X., Cai, L. A., Lu, L. (2014). Destination image and tourist loyalty: A meta-analysis. Tourism Management, 40, 213-223.
Zhao, M., Qiu, W. H., Liu, B. S. (2010). Relative entropy evaluation method for multiple attribute decision making [J]. Control and Decision, 25(7), 1098-1100.