بررسی تخلیه منابع و هزینه‌های اجتماعی در مدیریت‌های مختلف برنج و کاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه مهندسی مکانیک بیوسیستم، دانشکده مهندسی زراعی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران.

چکیده

در پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تخلیه منابع طبیعی و فسیلی در فرآیند تولید برنج در سه استان شمالی (مازندران، گیلان و گلستان) در دو نوع سامانه کشت (مرسوم و مکانیزه) و دو دسته برنج (ارقام کم­محصول و پرمحصول) پرداخته شد و به دنبال آن آلاینده­های منتشرشده و هزینه­های اجتماعی در مدیریت­های مختلف برنج و کاه برآورد گردید. بالاترین مجموع شاخص نهایی 56/6 (ارقام کم­محصول-کشت مکانیزه-استان گلستان) و پایین­ترین میزان 02/4 (ارقام پرمحصول-کشت مرسوم-استان گیلان) به دست آمد. نتایج انتشار گاز­های آلاینده در دو سناریو مختلف نشان داد که مقادیر این گازها در سناریو اول (سوزاندن کاه در مزرعه) نسبت به سناریو دوم (بسته­بندی کاه برای خوراک دام) بسیار بالاتر بود. همچنین بالاترین هزینه اجتماعی برای سوزاندن هر هکتار کاه به میزان 76/182 دلار (ارقام پرمحصول-کشت مرسوم-استان گیلان) و پایین­ترین میزان این پارامتر 34/105 دلار (ارقام کم­محصول-کشت مرسوم-استان مازندران) به دست آمد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation of Resources Depletion and Social Costs of Different Management on Rice and Straw

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Motevali 1
  • seyyed jafar Hashemi 2
  • Reza Tabatabaei kolor 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran
2 Associated Professor, Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The present study investigated the depletion of natural and fossil resources in rice production process in three Northern provinces (Mazandaran, Guilan and Golestan) in two types of regular cultivating systems (conventional and mechanized) and two types of rice (low and high yield). Also distributed pollutants and social costs were estimated in different rice and straw management. The highest final index was obtained to 6.56 (low yield varieties, mechanized cultivation, Golestan province) and the lowest level was 4.02 (high yield varieties, conventional cultivation, Guilan province). Results of emission of pollutants showed that in first scenario (straw burning in the field) pollutant emissions were much higher than the second scenario (straw packing for animal feed). Also, the highest social cost for burning per hectare of straw was 182.76 $ (high yield varieties, traditional cultivation, Guilan province) and the lowest value was 105.34 $ (low yield varieties, traditional cultivation, Mazandaran province).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Depletion of resources
  • pollutants gases
  • social cost
  • straw management
  • rice
AghaAlikhani, M., Kazemi-Poshtmasari, H. & Habibzadeh, F. (2013). Energy use pattern in rice production: A case study from Mazandaran province, Iran. Energy Conversion & Management 69, 157-162.
Agricultural statistical, (2014). Iran Agricultural Ministry. Tehran, Iran.
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Kuhlmann, H. & Lammel, J. (2004). Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy 20 (3), 247-264.
Buratti, C., Barbanera, M., & Fantozzi, F. (2009). Environmental impact assessment of fiber sorghum (Sudan-Grass) production systems for biomass energy production in a central region of Italy. Available at:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254398987_ENVIRONMENTAL_IMPACT_ASSESSMENT_OF_FIBER_SORGHUM_SUDANGRASS_PRODUCTION_SYSTEMS_FOR_BIOMASS_ENERGY_PRODUCTIN_IN_A_CENTRAL_REGION_OF_ITALY.
Dastan, S., Noormohamadi, G., Madani, H., Soltani, A. (2015). Analysis of Energy Indices in Rice Production Systems in the Neka Region, Environmental Sciences, 13 (1): 53-66.
Emadi, B., Nikkhah, A. & Soltanali, H. (2016). Investigating the environmental impacts of kiwifruit production in Guilan province of Iran based on life cycle assessment methodology. Journal of Natural Environment 69 (1), 131-141. (In Farsi)
FAO, (2012). FAO statistical year book, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
FAO, (2013). FAO statistical year book, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Firouzi, S. & Nikkhah, A. (2015). Life cycle assessment of peanut production in sole cropping & mixed intercropping with bean systems. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology 7 (22), 268-279. (In Farsi)
Ghani Nugroho, S., Sunyoto, Lumbanraja, J., Suprapto, H., Sabe Ardjasa, W. & Kimura, M. (1997) Effect of rice variety on methane emission from an Indonesian paddy field, Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 43:4, 799-809.
Homauini, Z., Abolhassani L., Sabouhi, M. (2017). Environmental Impact Assessment of Different Varieties of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Paddy in the Kordkoy, Journal of Agroecology 10 (2): 580-602.
Izadkhah, M., Tajbakhsh, M., Hassanzadeh, A., 2011. Evaluation of Energy Efficiency of Conventional & Mechanized Farming System on Potato Production in East Azarbyjan Province. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 8 (2): 297-284. (In Farsi)
Kazemi, H., Kamkar, B., Lakzaei, S., Badsar, M. & Shahbyki, M. (2015). Energy flow analysis for rice production in different geographical regions of Iran. Energy 84, 390-396.
Khoramdel S, Shabahang, J., A. Ghafouri A. (2017). Evaluation of Environmental Impacts for Rice Agroecosystems using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 5(18): 1-14.
Luckow, P., Stanton, E.A., Fields, S., Biewald, B., Jackson, S., Fisher, J. & Wilson, R. (2015). Carbon Dioxide Price Forecast. Synap. Energy Economics Inc. 1–39.
Mirhaji, H., Khojastehpour, M., & Abaspour-fard, M.H. (2013). Environmental effects of wheat production in the Marvdasht region. Journal of Natural Environment, 66(2), 223-232. (In Farsi)
Mohammadi-Barsari, A., Firoozi, S. & Aminpanah, H. (2016). Environmental impacts of watermelon production in Guilan province through Life Cycle Assessment. Iranian Journal of Bio-system Engineering, 47 (1), 139-146. (In Farsi)
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A.,  Rafiee, S.,  Mohtasebi, S.S., Hosseinzadeh-B&bafha, H. & Chau, K. (2019). Assessment of optimized pattern in milling factories of rice production based on energy, environmental and economic objectives. Energy 169, 1259-1273.
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Rafiee, S., Mohtasebi, S.S., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Chau, K., 2017. Energy consumption enhancement and environmental life cycle assessment in paddy production using optimization techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162: 571-586.
Nikkhah, A., Emadi, B., Soltanali, H., Firouzi, S., Rosentrater, K.A. & Allahyari, M.S. (2016). Integration of life cycle assessment and Cobb-Douglas modeling for the environmental assessment of kiwifruit in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production 137, 843-849.
Nikkhah, A., Khojastehpour, M., Emadi, B., Taheri-Rad, A. & Khorramdel, S. (2015). Environmental impacts of peanut production system using life cycle assessment methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 92, 84-90.
Nikkhah, A., Taheri-radm A., Khojastehpourm M., Emadim B. & Paymanm H. (2014). Environmental Impacts of Peanut Production in Astaneh Ashrafiyeh of Guilan Province. Journal of Agroecology 6 (2), 373-382. (In Farsi)
Nor-Hossini, S.A. & Nikkhah A., (2018). Investigating the environmental impacts for peanut production in Astaneh Ashrafieh based on nitrogen fertilizer consumption through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Journal of Plant Ecophysiology 10 (33): 156-173. (In Farsi)
Pearce, D. (2003). The Social Cost of Carbon & its Policy Implications. Oxford Review Economic Policy 19, 362–384.
Rahimi, N., Kargari, N., Samadyar, H. & Nikkhah Monfared, M. (2014). So0cial (External) Costs of NOx, SO2 and CO2 Emissions from Energy Sector (Power Plants) in Iran, Journal of Environmental Science & Technology 16 (3), 107-117. (In Farsi)
Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., Rydberg, T., Schmidt, W., Suh, S., Weidema, B.P. & Pennington, D.W. (2004). Life cycle assessment. Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environmental International 30, 701–720.
Silalertruksa, T. & Gheewala, S.H., (2013). A comparative LCA of rice straw utilization for fuels and fertilizer in Thailand. Bioresource Technology 150, 412–419.
Singh, R.B. (1993). Research and development strategies for intensification of rice production in Directorate of Rice Research. 25-44.
Soam, S., Borjesson, P., Sharma, P. K., Gupta, R. P., Tuli, D. K. & Kumar, R. (2017). Life cycle assessment of rice straw utilization practices in India. Bioresource Technology 228, 89–98.
Wang, M., Xia, X., Zhang, Q. & Liu, J. (2010). Life cycle assessment of a rice production system in Taihu region, China. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 17(2), 157-161.
Yodkhum, S., Sampattagul, S. & Gheewala, S.H. (2018). Energy & environmental impact analysis of rice cultivation and straw management in northern Thailand. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 25, 17654–17664