ارزیابی و انتخاب بهترین روش وجین‌کاری علف‌های هرز برنج با استفاده از تکنیک رتبه‌بندی تاپسیس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه مهندسی ماشین‌های کشاورزی، دانشکده مهندسی و فناوری کشاورزی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران

چکیده

به‌منظور بررسی انتخاب بهترین روش وجین‌کاری برنج از بین روش‌های مختلف شامل وجین دستی، کنترل شیمیایی و وجین‌کن مکانیکی، پرسش‌نامه‌‌هایی بین کشاورزان و کارشناسان شهرستان صومعه‌سرا در استان گیلان توزیع گردید. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها یک رویکرد تلفیقی کمّی و کیفی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و با استفاده از روش آنتروپی، شاخص‌ها وزین شدند. راحتی‌کار، میزان آلودگی محیطی، تعداد کارگر مورد نیاز و هزینه، بیشترین وزن‌ها را داشته که نشان‌دهنده اهمیت این موارد برای کشاورزان و کارشناسان است. روش‌های چند شاخصه دارای شیوه‌های متنوعی در مراحل مختلف تصمیم‌گیری هستند. در این روش‌ها چندین گزینه بر اساس چندین معیار مختلف با هم مقایسه شده و در نهایت بهترین گزینه یا ترتیبی از گزینه‌های مناسب انتخاب می‌شوند. با استفاده از روش TOPSIS رتبه‌بندی بین روش‌های مختلف انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که وجین‌کن مکانیکی با 7221/0، دارای بیشترین درجه اهمیت می‌باشد و بعد از آن مبارزه شیمیایی با درجه اهمیت 5019/0 و وجین دستی با درجه اهمیت 3730/0 قرار دارند. تلاش و حمایت مسئولان در مدیریت، ارائه آموزش‌های مهارتی، فرهنگ‌سازی مناسب و تخصیص بودجه برای کشاورزان، از راهکارها مؤثر و نتیجه‌بخش به‌شمار می‌روند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating and Selecting the Best Method of Weeding in Rice Farm Using TOPSIS Ranking Technique

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nahid Taherzadeh-Shalmaei
  • Mohammad Sharifi
  • Hassan Ghasemi-Mobtaker
Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

In order to evaluate the selection of the best method for rice cultivation from among different methods including: manual weeding, chemical control and mechanical weeding, questionnaires were distributed among farmers and experts of Sowme'eh Sara city in Guilan province. A quantitative and qualitative integration approach was used to analyze the data, and the characteristics were weighed using the entropy method. The comfort of the labor, the amount of environmental pollution, the number of labors needed and the cost have the highest weights, which indicates the importance of these cases for farmers and experts. Multi-indicator methods have a variety of methods at different stages of decision making. In these methods, several options are compared based on several different criteria, and finally the best option or sequence of appropriate options is selected. Using the TOPSIS method, ranking was performed between different weeding methods. The results showed that the highest degree of impact is related to the mechanical weeder with 0.7221, followed by chemical control and manual weeding with importance degree of 0.5019 and 0.3730, respectively. Efforts and support from officials in management, providing skills training, proper culture, and budget allocation for farmers are effective and effective solutions.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rice weed
  • TOPSIS method
  • Manual weeding
  • Chemical control
  • Mechanical weeding
Amanpour, S., Alizadeh, H. & Baqsafie, D. (2013). Assessing the level of development of cities in Kermanshah province in terms of having urban service indicators. Journal of Environmental layout, 23(6), 105-126. (In Farsi)
Amani, H., Nourang, A. & Jahanshahi, H. (2013). Development of the Supplier Selection Model by Applying Fuzzy MCDM Technique with Regarding to Criteria Interdependence. Journal of Supply chain management. 41(15), 60-69. (In Farsi)
Asgharpour, M. J. (2010) Multi-criteria decision making. Tehran: University of Tehran. (In Farsi)
Bakhshi, F., Tabatabaie-Kelour, R., Hashemi, S. J. & Aqagolzadeh, H. (2015). Investigating the field performance of a two-row and portable paddy machine. In:  Proceedings of 16th National Rice Conference, 16-17 February., Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari, Iran. (In Farsi)
Constanta-Zoie, R., Turek-Rahoveanu, A. & Radulescu, M. (2010). A hybrid multi-criteria method for performance evaluation of Romanian South Monteria Region in context of sustainable agriculture. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Computer Science.
Dass, A., Shekhawat, K., Choudhary, A. K., Sepat, S., Rathore, S. S., Mahajan, G. & Chauhan, B. S. (2017). Weed management in rice using crop competition-a review. Crop Protection (Vol. 95). (pp. 45-52).
Ebadzadeh, H., Ahmadi, K., Mohammadnia-Afrouzi, Sh., Abastaleghani, R., Abasi, M. & Yari, Sh. (2018). Agricultural Statistics. Retrieved April, 2020, Ministry of Jihad Agriculture, from http://www. amar.maj.ir.
Ertuğrul, I. & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(7), 783–795.
Eskandari-cherati, F. (2012). Use of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Evaluating and Selecting the Best Method for Weeding Rice Weeds. In: Proceedings of 7th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, 4-6 September., Shiraz university, Shiraz, Iran. (In Farsi)
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2018). Production year book in FAO. Retrieved April, 2020, from http://www.fao.org/Production year book.
Fathi-Ashtiyani, A. (2010). Psychological tests: personality and mental health. Tehran: Besat. (In Farsi)
Fernandes, E. C. M. & Uphoff, N. (2002). In Assessment of the System for Rice Intensification (SRI). In: Proceedings of an International Conference held in Sanya, 1-4 April, China.
Feyz Abadi, Y. & Molaie, N. (2018). Analysis of the position of knowledge management components in Jihad Keshavarzi organization of Mazandaran province. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 9(43), 30-41. (In Farsi).
Firouzi, S. Safarzad-Vishgaie, M. N. & Alizadeh, M. R. (2011). Field performance survey of four methods of peanut weeding. Journal of Agricultural machinery, 1(2), 92-99. (In Farsi)
Ghanbari, Y., Barghi, H. & Hejazian., A. (2014). Analysis and prioritization of development degree in Lorestan province using Topsis technique. Journal of Regional Urban Studies and Research, 6(21), 169-180. (In Farsi)
Ghodsipour, H. (2002). Analytical Hierarchy Data Process. Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology publisher. (In Farsi)
Golmohammadi, M.J., Mohammad alizadeh, H., Yaghoubi, B., Nahvi, M. & Oveysi, M. (2009). The Competitive Effect of Echinochloa oryzicola and Echinochloa crusgalli on yield, yield components and rice growth indicators. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 43(2), 189-201. (In Farsi)
Hasanimehr, S. S. & Abdolahzadeh-Chamani, A. (2011). Recognition of ecotourism backgrounds (Study sample: Sowme'eh Sara - Guilan). Journal of Encyclopedia, 2(82), 1-14. (In Farsi)
Hassanshahi, H., Iravani, H., Daneshvar-Ameri, Z. & Kalantari, K. (2015). Measure and comparison of economic, social and ecological sustainability of farming systems in the Marvdasht plain. Journal of Desert, 20(2), 231-239.
Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. (2012). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey (Vol. 186). Springer Science & Business Media.
Karam, A. & Kiayi, T. (2014). Location and prioritization of potential locations for physical development using TOPSIS hierarchical method and GIS geographic information system (Case study: Daryoun city). Applied Geomorphology of Iran, 2(3), 47-64. (In Farsi)
Kepner, R. A., Bainer, R. & Barger, E. L. (1978). Principles of Farm Machinery (3rd ed). USA:  AVI Publishing Company, Westport.
Khodaverdi, A. & Forouzani, M. (2016). Leveling of the provinces of Iran in terms of levels of development of agricultural mechanization. In: Proceedings of 2th National Conference on Mechanization and New Technologies in Agriculture. 10 May, Ramin Khuzestan Institute of Agriculture and Ramin University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Ahvaz, Iran.
Lemerle, D. & Sutherland, S. (2000). Will farmers adopt integrated weed management without resistance. In: Proceedings of Abstracts of the Third International Weed Science Congress, 6-11 June, Brazil, pp. 68–69.
Lozano, J.M.S., Cascales, M.S.G. & Lamata, M.T. (2016). Comparative TOPSIS-ELECTRE TRI methods for optimal sites for photovoltaic solar farms, case study in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127(16), 387-398.
Ministry of Jihad Agriculture. (2019). Cereal annual report. Year-book, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsenzadeh, S., Namazi, N. R., Kardani-Esfahani, A. S. & Ahomanesh, Z. (2016). Application of TOPSIS fan in economic ranking of some cultivars of wheat cultivated in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11(1), 163–183. (In Farsi)
Nojavan, M. (2001) Principles of weed control. Urmia: University of Urmia. (In Farsi).
Okpala, N. E., Potcho, M. p., An, T., Ahator, S. D., Duan, L. & Tang, X. (2020). Low temperature increased the biosynthesis of 2-AP, cooked rice elongation percentage and amylose content percentage in rice. Journal of Cereal Science, 93(1), 102980-102986.
Rahman, M. S., Monayem-Miah, M. A. zaman, M. & Hossain, Sh. (2011). Impact of farm mechanization on labor use for wheat cultivation in northern Bangladesh. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21(3), 589-594.
Sheykhbiglou, R & Taqvaei, M. (2013). Evaluating the level of development of the country's cities using multi-criteria decision making methods. Geography, 11(39), 138-157.
Singh, G., Moses, S. C. & Dahate, H. (2015). Study of Low Land Rice Weeder and Development of Fing Cutting Attachments. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 5(4), 315-322.
Wang, Y.M., & Elhag, T.M.S. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(2), 309–319.
Yousefnia-Pasha, H. (2011). Design, construction an evaluation of portable and powered rice weeding machine. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Machine, Sari Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources University.
Yousefnia-Pasha, H., Tabatabaei, R. & Hashemi, J. (2012). Comparison of efficiency and cost of rice production in different methods of weed control. 7th National Congress of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering.
Zhang, Y.L. & You, W.J. (2014). Research on social vulnerability assessment of urban natural disaster based on TOPSIS-taking Shanghai as an example. Disaster Science, 29(1), 109-114
Zhao, M., Qiu, W. H., Liu, B. S. (2010). Relative entropy evaluation method for multiple attribute decision making [J]. Control and Decision, 25(7), 1098-1100.